WallStSmart

Rush Enterprises A Inc (RUSHA)vsConstellation Brands Inc Class A (STZ)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Constellation Brands Inc Class A generates 26% more annual revenue ($9.14B vs $7.27B). STZ leads profitability with a 18.5% profit margin vs 3.6%. STZ appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 2.74. STZ earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 56/100 (C).

RUSHA

Hold

47

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 4.0Profit: 5.0Value: 6.0Quality: 6.3
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 3.13

STZ

Buy

56

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 2.0Profit: 8.5Value: 5.0Quality: 5.5
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 1.95
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

RUSHAUndervalued (+55.8%)

Margin of Safety

+55.8%

Fair Value

$164.81

Current Price

$72.31

$92.50 discount

UndervaluedFair: $164.81Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for STZ.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

RUSHA2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.1310/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Price/BookValuation
2.5x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

STZ3 strengths · Avg: 8.3/10
Return on EquityProfitability
22.6%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 23 in profit

P/E RatioValuation
15.6x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Operating MarginProfitability
26.7%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 26.7%

Areas to Watch

RUSHA4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Profit MarginProfitability
3.6%3/10

3.6% margin — thin

Operating MarginProfitability
4.9%3/10

Operating margin of 4.9%

PEG RatioValuation
3.162/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-9.0%2/10

Revenue declined 9.0%

STZ4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.954/10

Grey zone — moderate risk

Debt/EquityHealth
1.383/10

Elevated debt levels

PEG RatioValuation
2.742/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-11.3%2/10

Revenue declined 11.3%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : RUSHA

The strongest argument for RUSHA centers on Altman Z-Score, Price/Book.

Bull Case : STZ

The strongest argument for STZ centers on Return on Equity, P/E Ratio, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 18.5% and operating margin at 26.7%.

Bear Case : RUSHA

The primary concerns for RUSHA are Profit Margin, Operating Margin, PEG Ratio. Thin 3.6% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : STZ

The primary concerns for STZ are Altman Z-Score, Debt/Equity, PEG Ratio.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

RUSHA profiles as a value stock while STZ is a declining play — different risk/reward profiles.

RUSHA carries more volatility with a beta of 0.93 — expect wider price swings.

RUSHA is growing revenue faster at -9.0% — sustainability is the question.

STZ generates stronger free cash flow (344M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

STZ scores higher overall (56/100 vs 47/100), backed by strong 18.5% margins. RUSHA offers better value entry with a 55.8% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Rush Enterprises A Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · AUTO & TRUCK DEALERSHIPS · USA

Rush Enterprises, Inc. is an integrated retailer of commercial vehicles and related services in the United States. The company is headquartered in New Braunfels, Texas.

Constellation Brands Inc Class A

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · BEVERAGES - BREWERS · USA

Constellation Brands, Inc., headquartered in Victor, New York, is an American producer and marketer of beer, wine, and spirits.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?