WallStSmart

Rush Enterprises A Inc (RUSHA)vsW. R. Berkley Corp (WRB)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

W. R. Berkley Corp generates 104% more annual revenue ($14.85B vs $7.27B). WRB leads profitability with a 12.6% profit margin vs 3.6%. RUSHA appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 3.16. WRB earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 65/100 (C+).

RUSHA

Hold

47

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 4.0Profit: 5.0Value: 6.0Quality: 6.3
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 3.13

WRB

Buy

65

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 6.0Profit: 7.0Value: 5.0Quality: 4.8
Piotroski: 2/9
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

RUSHAUndervalued (+55.8%)

Margin of Safety

+55.8%

Fair Value

$164.81

Current Price

$72.31

$92.50 discount

UndervaluedFair: $164.81Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for WRB.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

RUSHA2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.1310/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Price/BookValuation
2.5x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

WRB4 strengths · Avg: 8.3/10
Return on EquityProfitability
20.2%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 20 in profit

P/E RatioValuation
14.1x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
2.6x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
26.0%8/10

Earnings expanding 26.0% YoY

Areas to Watch

RUSHA4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Profit MarginProfitability
3.6%3/10

3.6% margin — thin

Operating MarginProfitability
4.9%3/10

Operating margin of 4.9%

PEG RatioValuation
3.162/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-9.0%2/10

Revenue declined 9.0%

WRB3 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
4.0%4/10

4.0% revenue growth

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
3.872/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : RUSHA

The strongest argument for RUSHA centers on Altman Z-Score, Price/Book.

Bull Case : WRB

The strongest argument for WRB centers on Return on Equity, P/E Ratio, Price/Book.

Bear Case : RUSHA

The primary concerns for RUSHA are Profit Margin, Operating Margin, PEG Ratio. Thin 3.6% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : WRB

The primary concerns for WRB are Revenue Growth, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

RUSHA carries more volatility with a beta of 0.93 — expect wider price swings.

WRB is growing revenue faster at 4.0% — sustainability is the question.

WRB generates stronger free cash flow (640M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor AUTO & TRUCK DEALERSHIPS industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

WRB scores higher overall (65/100 vs 47/100). RUSHA offers better value entry with a 55.8% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Rush Enterprises A Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · AUTO & TRUCK DEALERSHIPS · USA

Rush Enterprises, Inc. is an integrated retailer of commercial vehicles and related services in the United States. The company is headquartered in New Braunfels, Texas.

W. R. Berkley Corp

FINANCIAL SERVICES · INSURANCE - PROPERTY & CASUALTY · USA

W. R. Berkley Corporation is a commercial lines property & casualty insurance holding company organized in Delaware and based in Greenwich, Connecticut.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?