WallStSmart

The AES Corporation (AES)vsVistra Corp. (VST)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Vistra Corp. generates 56% more annual revenue ($19.45B vs $12.49B). VST leads profitability with a 11.5% profit margin vs 10.8%. VST appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.46. AES earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 71/100 (B).

AES

Strong Buy

71

out of 100

Grade: B

Growth: 6.0Profit: 7.0Value: 6.0Quality: 2.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 0.48

VST

Strong Buy

68

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 4.7Profit: 8.0Value: 7.0Quality: 2.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 0.60
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

AESSignificantly Overvalued (-44.1%)

Margin of Safety

-44.1%

Fair Value

$11.41

Current Price

$14.67

$3.26 premium

UndervaluedFair: $11.41Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for VST.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

AES4 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
P/E RatioValuation
7.7x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Return on EquityProfitability
30.3%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 30 in profit

EPS GrowthGrowth
951.0%10/10

Earnings expanding 951.0% YoY

Price/BookValuation
2.4x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

VST5 strengths · Avg: 9.4/10
PEG RatioValuation
0.4610/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Return on EquityProfitability
40.0%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 40 in profit

Revenue GrowthGrowth
43.4%10/10

Revenue surging 43.4% year-over-year

Market CapQuality
$53.26B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Operating MarginProfitability
26.6%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 26.6%

Areas to Watch

AES4 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-565.00M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
0.482/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Debt/EquityHealth
7.011/10

Elevated debt levels

VST4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
P/E RatioValuation
26.4x4/10

Moderate valuation

Price/BookValuation
19.8x4/10

Trading at 19.8x book value

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

EPS GrowthGrowth
-52.3%2/10

Earnings declined 52.3%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : AES

The strongest argument for AES centers on P/E Ratio, Return on Equity, EPS Growth. PEG of 1.09 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : VST

The strongest argument for VST centers on PEG Ratio, Return on Equity, Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 43.4% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 0.46 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : AES

The primary concerns for AES are Piotroski F-Score, Free Cash Flow, Altman Z-Score. Debt-to-equity of 7.01 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : VST

The primary concerns for VST are P/E Ratio, Price/Book, Piotroski F-Score. Debt-to-equity of 3.56 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

AES profiles as a value stock while VST is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

VST carries more volatility with a beta of 1.45 — expect wider price swings.

VST is growing revenue faster at 43.4% — sustainability is the question.

VST generates stronger free cash flow (156M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

AES scores higher overall (71/100 vs 68/100). Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Strong Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

The AES Corporation

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - DIVERSIFIED · USA

The AES Corporation is a Fortune 500 company that generates and distributes electrical power. AES is headquartered in Arlington, Virginia.

Visit Website →

Vistra Corp.

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - INDEPENDENT POWER PRODUCERS · USA

Vistra Corp. The company is headquartered in Irving, Texas.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?