Canadian Natural Resources Ltd (CNQ)vsCoterra Energy Inc (CTRA)
CNQ
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd
$45.70
-0.31%
ENERGY · Cap: $98.47B
CTRA
Coterra Energy Inc
$32.56
-8.62%
ENERGY · Cap: $24.72B
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd generates 425% more annual revenue ($38.63B vs $7.35B). CNQ leads profitability with a 25.1% profit margin vs 22.7%. CNQ appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 3.42. CTRA earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 63/100 (C+).
CNQ
Buy58
out of 100
Grade: C
CTRA
Buy63
out of 100
Grade: C+
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Margin of Safety
+45.4%
Fair Value
$83.74
Current Price
$45.70
$38.04 discount
Margin of Safety
+69.8%
Fair Value
$104.65
Current Price
$32.56
$72.09 discount
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Attractively priced relative to earnings
Every $100 of equity generates 30 in profit
Large-cap with strong market position
Keeps 25 of every $100 in revenue as profit
Reasonable price relative to book value
Strong operational efficiency at 21.8%
Keeps 23 of every $100 in revenue as profit
Attractively priced relative to earnings
Reasonable price relative to book value
Strong operational efficiency at 28.2%
18.6% revenue growth
Areas to Watch
Expensive relative to growth rate
Revenue declined 1.2%
Earnings declined 45.3%
Grey zone — moderate risk
Expensive relative to growth rate
Earnings declined 10.3%
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : CNQ
The strongest argument for CNQ centers on P/E Ratio, Return on Equity, Market Cap. Profitability is solid with margins at 25.1% and operating margin at 21.8%.
Bull Case : CTRA
The strongest argument for CTRA centers on Profit Margin, P/E Ratio, Price/Book. Profitability is solid with margins at 22.7% and operating margin at 28.2%. Revenue growth of 18.6% demonstrates continued momentum.
Bear Case : CNQ
The primary concerns for CNQ are PEG Ratio, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth.
Bear Case : CTRA
The primary concerns for CTRA are Altman Z-Score, PEG Ratio, EPS Growth.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
CNQ profiles as a declining stock while CTRA is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.
CNQ carries more volatility with a beta of 0.91 — expect wider price swings.
CTRA is growing revenue faster at 18.6% — sustainability is the question.
CTRA generates stronger free cash flow (991M), providing more financial flexibility.
Bottom Line
CTRA scores higher overall (63/100 vs 58/100), backed by strong 22.7% margins and 18.6% revenue growth. CNQ offers better value entry with a 45.4% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd
ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA
Canadian Natural Resources Limited acquires, explores, develops, produces, markets and sells crude oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids (NGL). The company is headquartered in Calgary, Canada.
Coterra Energy Inc
ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA
Coterra Energy Inc., an independent oil and gas company, explores, exploits, develops, produces and markets oil and gas properties in the United States. The company is headquartered in Houston, Texas.
Compare with Other OIL & GAS E&P Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?