Coterra Energy Inc (CTRA)vsDiamondback Energy Inc (FANG)
CTRA
Coterra Energy Inc
$32.56
-8.62%
ENERGY · Cap: $24.72B
FANG
Diamondback Energy Inc
$192.62
-5.09%
ENERGY · Cap: $56.94B
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
Diamondback Energy Inc generates 97% more annual revenue ($14.46B vs $7.35B). CTRA leads profitability with a 22.7% profit margin vs 2.0%. CTRA appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 44.67. CTRA earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 63/100 (C+).
CTRA
Buy63
out of 100
Grade: C+
FANG
Hold41
out of 100
Grade: D
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Margin of Safety
+69.8%
Fair Value
$104.65
Current Price
$32.56
$72.09 discount
Margin of Safety
+41.1%
Fair Value
$286.80
Current Price
$192.62
$94.18 discount
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Keeps 23 of every $100 in revenue as profit
Attractively priced relative to earnings
Reasonable price relative to book value
Strong operational efficiency at 28.2%
18.6% revenue growth
Reasonable price relative to book value
Large-cap with strong market position
Areas to Watch
Grey zone — moderate risk
Expensive relative to growth rate
Earnings declined 10.3%
4.2% revenue growth
ROE of 1.1% — below average capital efficiency
2.0% margin — thin
Weak financial health signals
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : CTRA
The strongest argument for CTRA centers on Profit Margin, P/E Ratio, Price/Book. Profitability is solid with margins at 22.7% and operating margin at 28.2%. Revenue growth of 18.6% demonstrates continued momentum.
Bull Case : FANG
The strongest argument for FANG centers on Price/Book, Market Cap.
Bear Case : CTRA
The primary concerns for CTRA are Altman Z-Score, PEG Ratio, EPS Growth.
Bear Case : FANG
The primary concerns for FANG are Revenue Growth, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. A P/E of 208.7x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 2.0% margins leave little buffer for downturns.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
CTRA profiles as a growth stock while FANG is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.
FANG carries more volatility with a beta of 0.44 — expect wider price swings.
CTRA is growing revenue faster at 18.6% — sustainability is the question.
CTRA generates stronger free cash flow (991M), providing more financial flexibility.
Bottom Line
CTRA scores higher overall (63/100 vs 41/100), backed by strong 22.7% margins and 18.6% revenue growth. FANG offers better value entry with a 41.1% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
Coterra Energy Inc
ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA
Coterra Energy Inc., an independent oil and gas company, explores, exploits, develops, produces and markets oil and gas properties in the United States. The company is headquartered in Houston, Texas.
Diamondback Energy Inc
ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA
Diamondback Energy is a company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration and headquartered in Midland, Texas.
Compare with Other OIL & GAS E&P Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?