WallStSmart

ConocoPhillips (COP)vsCrescent Energy Co (CRGY)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

ConocoPhillips generates 1457% more annual revenue ($59.38B vs $3.81B). COP leads profitability with a 12.3% profit margin vs -7.5%. CRGY earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 56/100 (C).

COP

Buy

56

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 2.0Profit: 6.5Value: 5.7Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 2.36

CRGY

Buy

56

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 8.0Profit: 2.5Value: 4.0Quality: 3.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 0.90
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for COP.

CRGYSignificantly Overvalued (-33.7%)

Margin of Safety

-33.7%

Fair Value

$7.89

Current Price

$11.57

$3.68 premium

UndervaluedFair: $7.89Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

COP4 strengths · Avg: 8.3/10
Market CapQuality
$143.69B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Price/BookValuation
2.2x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Operating MarginProfitability
22.1%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 22.1%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.35B8/10

Generating 1.3B in free cash flow

CRGY3 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
Price/BookValuation
0.8x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
80.0%10/10

Earnings expanding 80.0% YoY

Revenue GrowthGrowth
24.5%8/10

Revenue surging 24.5% year-over-year

Areas to Watch

COP2 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
-5.3%2/10

Revenue declined 5.3%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-20.2%2/10

Earnings declined 20.2%

CRGY4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Debt/EquityHealth
1.153/10

Elevated debt levels

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-6.1%2/10

ROE of -6.1% — below average capital efficiency

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-263.03M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : COP

The strongest argument for COP centers on Market Cap, Price/Book, Operating Margin. PEG of 1.02 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : CRGY

The strongest argument for CRGY centers on Price/Book, EPS Growth, Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 24.5% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : COP

The primary concerns for COP are Revenue Growth, EPS Growth.

Bear Case : CRGY

The primary concerns for CRGY are Debt/Equity, Piotroski F-Score, Return on Equity.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

COP profiles as a declining stock while CRGY is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

CRGY carries more volatility with a beta of 0.91 — expect wider price swings.

CRGY is growing revenue faster at 24.5% — sustainability is the question.

COP generates stronger free cash flow (1.3B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

COP scores higher overall (56/100 vs 56/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

ConocoPhillips

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

ConocoPhillips is an American multinational corporation engaged in hydrocarbon exploration. It is based in the Energy Corridor district of Houston, Texas.

Crescent Energy Co

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

Crescent Energy Co (CRGY) is a leading independent oil and natural gas exploration and production company, focusing on the development of onshore resources within high-yield shale formations across the United States. Committed to sustainability and capital efficiency, Crescent utilizes advanced technologies to enhance production and recovery, fostering disciplined growth. The company's strategic positioning allows it to effectively navigate the evolving energy market, aiming to deliver strong financial performance while capitalizing on emerging opportunities and maintaining a competitive edge in the sector.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?