WallStSmart

ConocoPhillips (COP)vsGeoPark Ltd (GPRK)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

ConocoPhillips generates 12139% more annual revenue ($60.28B vs $492.50M). COP leads profitability with a 13.3% profit margin vs 10.1%. GPRK trades at a lower P/E of 9.9x. GPRK earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 57/100 (C).

COP

Hold

48

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 2.0Profit: 6.5Value: 4.7Quality: 5.0

GPRK

Buy

57

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 4.7Profit: 7.0Value: 8.3Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 1.19
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

COPSignificantly Overvalued (-157.1%)

Margin of Safety

-157.1%

Fair Value

$43.25

Current Price

$128.93

$85.68 premium

UndervaluedFair: $43.25Overvalued
GPRKUndervalued (+80.8%)

Margin of Safety

+80.8%

Fair Value

$44.93

Current Price

$9.47

$35.46 discount

UndervaluedFair: $44.93Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

COP3 strengths · Avg: 8.3/10
Market CapQuality
$157.60B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Price/BookValuation
2.4x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.29B8/10

Generating 1.3B in free cash flow

GPRK4 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
P/E RatioValuation
9.9x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

EPS GrowthGrowth
103.5%10/10

Earnings expanding 103.5% YoY

Return on EquityProfitability
22.1%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 22 in profit

Price/BookValuation
2.0x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

COP3 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
4.222/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-6.8%2/10

Revenue declined 6.8%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-39.0%2/10

Earnings declined 39.0%

GPRK4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Market CapQuality
$493.17M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-23.3%2/10

Revenue declined 23.3%

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.192/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : COP

The strongest argument for COP centers on Market Cap, Price/Book, Free Cash Flow.

Bull Case : GPRK

The strongest argument for GPRK centers on P/E Ratio, EPS Growth, Return on Equity.

Bear Case : COP

The primary concerns for COP are PEG Ratio, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth.

Bear Case : GPRK

The primary concerns for GPRK are Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score, Revenue Growth. Debt-to-equity of 2.86 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

GPRK carries more volatility with a beta of 0.43 — expect wider price swings.

COP is growing revenue faster at -6.8% — sustainability is the question.

COP generates stronger free cash flow (1.3B), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor OIL & GAS E&P industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

GPRK scores higher overall (57/100 vs 48/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

ConocoPhillips

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

ConocoPhillips is an American multinational corporation engaged in hydrocarbon exploration. It is based in the Energy Corridor district of Houston, Texas.

GeoPark Ltd

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

GeoPark Limited is engaged in the exploration, development and production of oil and gas reserves in Chile, Colombia, Brazil, Argentina, Peru and Ecuador. The company is headquartered in Santiago, Chile.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?