ConocoPhillips (COP)vsMcKesson Corporation (MCK)
COP
ConocoPhillips
$113.87
-0.88%
ENERGY · Cap: $139.96B
MCK
McKesson Corporation
$736.09
-2.47%
HEALTHCARE · Cap: $92.45B
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
McKesson Corporation generates 570% more annual revenue ($397.96B vs $59.38B). COP leads profitability with a 12.3% profit margin vs 1.1%. MCK appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.90. MCK earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 62/100 (C+).
COP
Buy56
out of 100
Grade: C
MCK
Buy62
out of 100
Grade: C+
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Margin of Safety
-50.4%
Fair Value
$73.94
Current Price
$113.87
$39.93 premium
Margin of Safety
+63.8%
Fair Value
$2633.47
Current Price
$736.09
$1897.38 discount
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Large-cap with strong market position
Reasonable price relative to book value
Strong operational efficiency at 22.1%
Generating 1.3B in free cash flow
Conservative balance sheet, low leverage
Large-cap with strong market position
Growing faster than its price suggests
Earnings expanding 38.0% YoY
Generating 3.4B in free cash flow
Areas to Watch
Revenue declined 5.3%
Earnings declined 20.2%
ROE of 0.0% — below average capital efficiency
1.1% margin — thin
Operating margin of 1.6%
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : COP
The strongest argument for COP centers on Market Cap, Price/Book, Operating Margin. PEG of 1.14 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.
Bull Case : MCK
The strongest argument for MCK centers on Debt/Equity, Market Cap, PEG Ratio. Revenue growth of 11.4% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 0.90 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.
Bear Case : COP
The primary concerns for COP are Revenue Growth, EPS Growth.
Bear Case : MCK
The primary concerns for MCK are Return on Equity, Profit Margin, Operating Margin. Thin 1.1% margins leave little buffer for downturns.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
COP profiles as a declining stock while MCK is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.
MCK carries more volatility with a beta of 0.35 — expect wider price swings.
MCK is growing revenue faster at 11.4% — sustainability is the question.
MCK generates stronger free cash flow (3.4B), providing more financial flexibility.
Bottom Line
MCK scores higher overall (62/100 vs 56/100) and 11.4% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
ConocoPhillips
ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA
ConocoPhillips is an American multinational corporation engaged in hydrocarbon exploration. It is based in the Energy Corridor district of Houston, Texas.
McKesson Corporation
HEALTHCARE · MEDICAL DISTRIBUTION · USA
McKesson Corporation is an American company distributing pharmaceuticals and providing health information technology, medical supplies, and care management tools.
Visit Website →Compare with Other OIL & GAS E&P Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?