WallStSmart

ConocoPhillips (COP)vsOmnicom Group Inc (OMC)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

ConocoPhillips generates 249% more annual revenue ($60.28B vs $17.27B). COP leads profitability with a 13.3% profit margin vs -0.3%. COP appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 4.22. OMC earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 49/100 (D+).

COP

Hold

48

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 2.0Profit: 6.5Value: 4.7Quality: 5.0

OMC

Hold

49

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 5.3Profit: 4.5Value: 4.0Quality: 3.5
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 0.76
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

COPSignificantly Overvalued (-157.1%)

Margin of Safety

-157.1%

Fair Value

$43.25

Current Price

$128.93

$85.68 premium

UndervaluedFair: $43.25Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for OMC.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

COP3 strengths · Avg: 8.3/10
Market CapQuality
$157.60B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Price/BookValuation
2.4x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.29B8/10

Generating 1.3B in free cash flow

OMC3 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Price/BookValuation
2.0x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Revenue GrowthGrowth
27.9%8/10

Revenue surging 27.9% year-over-year

Free Cash FlowQuality
$3.00B8/10

Generating 3.0B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

COP3 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
4.222/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-6.8%2/10

Revenue declined 6.8%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-39.0%2/10

Earnings declined 39.0%

OMC4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Return on EquityProfitability
0.5%3/10

ROE of 0.5% — below average capital efficiency

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
15.972/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

EPS GrowthGrowth
-10.3%2/10

Earnings declined 10.3%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : COP

The strongest argument for COP centers on Market Cap, Price/Book, Free Cash Flow.

Bull Case : OMC

The strongest argument for OMC centers on Price/Book, Revenue Growth, Free Cash Flow. Revenue growth of 27.9% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : COP

The primary concerns for COP are PEG Ratio, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth.

Bear Case : OMC

The primary concerns for OMC are Return on Equity, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

COP profiles as a declining stock while OMC is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

OMC carries more volatility with a beta of 0.71 — expect wider price swings.

OMC is growing revenue faster at 27.9% — sustainability is the question.

OMC generates stronger free cash flow (3.0B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

OMC scores higher overall (49/100 vs 48/100) and 27.9% revenue growth. Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

ConocoPhillips

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

ConocoPhillips is an American multinational corporation engaged in hydrocarbon exploration. It is based in the Energy Corridor district of Houston, Texas.

Omnicom Group Inc

COMMUNICATION SERVICES · ADVERTISING AGENCIES · USA

Omnicom Group Inc. is an American global media, marketing and corporate communications holding company, headquartered in New York City.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?