WallStSmart

Darling Ingredients Inc (DAR)vsGeneral Mills Inc (GIS)

VS
⚡

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

General Mills Inc generates 179% more annual revenue ($18.30B vs $6.55B). DAR leads profitability with a 9.1% profit margin vs -4.9%. DAR appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 4.31. DAR earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 64/100 (C+).

DAR

Buy

64

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 6.7Profit: 5.5Value: 6.0Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 1.83

GIS

Hold

42

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 2.0Profit: 4.5Value: 4.0Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 1.99
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

DARUndervalued (+18.1%)

Margin of Safety

+18.1%

Fair Value

$60.56

Current Price

$55.73

$4.83 discount

UndervaluedFair: $60.56Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for GIS.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

DAR4 strengths · Avg: 8.5/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
2914.0%10/10

Earnings expanding 2914.0% YoY

P/E RatioValuation
14.9x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
1.7x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Revenue GrowthGrowth
16.4%8/10

16.4% revenue growth

GIS1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Price/BookValuation
2.5x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

DAR3 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.834/10

Grey zone — moderate risk

Return on EquityProfitability
4.6%3/10

ROE of 4.6% — below average capital efficiency

PEG RatioValuation
4.312/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

GIS4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.994/10

Grey zone — moderate risk

Debt/EquityHealth
1.833/10

Elevated debt levels

PEG RatioValuation
17.232/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Return on EquityProfitability
-12.0%2/10

ROE of -12.0% — below average capital efficiency

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : DAR

The strongest argument for DAR centers on EPS Growth, P/E Ratio, Price/Book. Revenue growth of 16.4% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : GIS

The strongest argument for GIS centers on Price/Book.

Bear Case : DAR

The primary concerns for DAR are Altman Z-Score, Return on Equity, PEG Ratio.

Bear Case : GIS

The primary concerns for GIS are Altman Z-Score, Debt/Equity, PEG Ratio. Debt-to-equity of 1.83 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

DAR profiles as a growth stock while GIS is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.

DAR carries more volatility with a beta of 1.05 — expect wider price swings.

DAR is growing revenue faster at 16.4% — sustainability is the question.

DAR generates stronger free cash flow (405M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

DAR scores higher overall (64/100 vs 42/100) and 16.4% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Darling Ingredients Inc

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · PACKAGED FOODS · USA

Darling Ingredients Inc. develops, produces and sells natural ingredients from edible and non-edible bio-nutrients. The company is headquartered in Irving, Texas.

Visit Website →

General Mills Inc

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · PACKAGED FOODS · USA

General Mills, Inc., is an American multinational manufacturer and marketer of branded consumer foods sold through retail stores. It is headquartered in Golden Valley, Minnesota, a suburb of Minneapolis.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?