WallStSmart

Darling Ingredients Inc (DAR)vsTarget Corporation (TGT)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Target Corporation generates 1587% more annual revenue ($106.38B vs $6.31B). DAR leads profitability with a 3.5% profit margin vs 3.2%. TGT appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 2.51. TGT earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 52/100 (C-).

DAR

Hold

46

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 3.3Profit: 4.5Value: 4.0Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 1.86

TGT

Buy

52

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 3.3Profit: 5.5Value: 5.3Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.47
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

DARUndervalued (+14.9%)

Margin of Safety

+14.9%

Fair Value

$58.29

Current Price

$59.45

$1.16 discount

UndervaluedFair: $58.29Overvalued
TGTUndervalued (+4.0%)

Margin of Safety

+4.0%

Fair Value

$119.45

Current Price

$122.57

$3.12 discount

UndervaluedFair: $119.45Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

DAR1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.9x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

TGT4 strengths · Avg: 8.8/10
Market CapQuality
$60.48B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Return on EquityProfitability
21.0%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 21 in profit

Debt/EquityHealth
0.289/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

P/E RatioValuation
17.6x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Areas to Watch

DAR4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.864/10

Grey zone — moderate risk

Return on EquityProfitability
4.6%3/10

ROE of 4.6% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
3.5%3/10

3.5% margin — thin

PEG RatioValuation
4.312/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

TGT4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Profit MarginProfitability
3.2%3/10

3.2% margin — thin

Operating MarginProfitability
4.5%3/10

Operating margin of 4.5%

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
2.512/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : DAR

The strongest argument for DAR centers on Price/Book. Revenue growth of 12.3% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : TGT

The strongest argument for TGT centers on Market Cap, Return on Equity, Debt/Equity.

Bear Case : DAR

The primary concerns for DAR are Altman Z-Score, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. A P/E of 41.3x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 3.5% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : TGT

The primary concerns for TGT are Profit Margin, Operating Margin, Piotroski F-Score. Thin 3.2% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

DAR carries more volatility with a beta of 1.03 — expect wider price swings.

DAR is growing revenue faster at 12.3% — sustainability is the question.

DAR generates stronger free cash flow (58M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor PACKAGED FOODS industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

TGT scores higher overall (52/100 vs 46/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Darling Ingredients Inc

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · PACKAGED FOODS · USA

Darling Ingredients Inc. develops, produces and sells natural ingredients from edible and non-edible bio-nutrients. The company is headquartered in Irving, Texas.

Visit Website →

Target Corporation

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · DISCOUNT STORES · USA

Target Corporation is an American retail corporation. Their retail formats include the discount store Target, the hypermarket SuperTarget, and small-format stores previously named CityTarget and TargetExpress before being consolidated under the Target branding.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?