WallStSmart

Diamondback Energy Inc (FANG)vsGran Tierra Energy Inc (GTE)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Diamondback Energy Inc generates 2307% more annual revenue ($14.46B vs $600.60M). FANG leads profitability with a 2.0% profit margin vs -48.8%. GTE appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.23. FANG earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 41/100 (D).

FANG

Hold

41

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 4.7Profit: 4.0Value: 4.7Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 1.28

GTE

Hold

40

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 2.7Profit: 2.0Value: 6.7Quality: 2.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: -0.58
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FANGUndervalued (+41.1%)

Margin of Safety

+41.1%

Fair Value

$286.80

Current Price

$192.62

$94.18 discount

UndervaluedFair: $286.80Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for GTE.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FANG2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Price/BookValuation
1.5x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Market CapQuality
$56.94B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

GTE2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
0.2310/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Price/BookValuation
2.5x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

FANG4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
4.2%4/10

4.2% revenue growth

Return on EquityProfitability
1.1%3/10

ROE of 1.1% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
2.0%3/10

2.0% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

GTE4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
2.3%4/10

2.3% revenue growth

Market CapQuality
$269.44M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-269.0%2/10

ROE of -269.0% — below average capital efficiency

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FANG

The strongest argument for FANG centers on Price/Book, Market Cap.

Bull Case : GTE

The strongest argument for GTE centers on PEG Ratio, Price/Book. PEG of 0.23 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : FANG

The primary concerns for FANG are Revenue Growth, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. A P/E of 208.7x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 2.0% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : GTE

The primary concerns for GTE are Revenue Growth, Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score. Debt-to-equity of 5.76 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FANG profiles as a value stock while GTE is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.

FANG carries more volatility with a beta of 0.44 — expect wider price swings.

FANG is growing revenue faster at 4.2% — sustainability is the question.

FANG generates stronger free cash flow (895M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

FANG scores higher overall (41/100 vs 40/100). Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Diamondback Energy Inc

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

Diamondback Energy is a company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration and headquartered in Midland, Texas.

Gran Tierra Energy Inc

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

Gran Tierra Energy Inc., is dedicated to the exploration and production of oil and gas properties in Colombia and Ecuador. The company is headquartered in Calgary, Canada.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?