WallStSmart

ConocoPhillips (COP)vsGran Tierra Energy Inc (GTE)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

ConocoPhillips generates 10002% more annual revenue ($60.28B vs $596.71M). COP leads profitability with a 13.3% profit margin vs -32.4%. GTE appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.23. COP earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 48/100 (D+).

COP

Hold

48

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 2.0Profit: 6.5Value: 4.7Quality: 5.0

GTE

Hold

42

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 2.0Profit: 2.0Value: 6.7Quality: 2.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: -0.27
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

COPSignificantly Overvalued (-157.1%)

Margin of Safety

-157.1%

Fair Value

$43.25

Current Price

$128.93

$85.68 premium

UndervaluedFair: $43.25Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for GTE.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

COP3 strengths · Avg: 8.3/10
Market CapQuality
$157.60B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Price/BookValuation
2.4x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.29B8/10

Generating 1.3B in free cash flow

GTE2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
0.2310/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Price/BookValuation
1.3x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

COP3 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
4.222/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-6.8%2/10

Revenue declined 6.8%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-39.0%2/10

Earnings declined 39.0%

GTE4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Market CapQuality
$304.98M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-60.1%2/10

ROE of -60.1% — below average capital efficiency

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-10.0%2/10

Revenue declined 10.0%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : COP

The strongest argument for COP centers on Market Cap, Price/Book, Free Cash Flow.

Bull Case : GTE

The strongest argument for GTE centers on PEG Ratio, Price/Book. PEG of 0.23 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : COP

The primary concerns for COP are PEG Ratio, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth.

Bear Case : GTE

The primary concerns for GTE are Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score, Return on Equity. Debt-to-equity of 2.11 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

COP profiles as a declining stock while GTE is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.

GTE carries more volatility with a beta of 0.41 — expect wider price swings.

COP is growing revenue faster at -6.8% — sustainability is the question.

COP generates stronger free cash flow (1.3B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

COP scores higher overall (48/100 vs 42/100). Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

ConocoPhillips

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

ConocoPhillips is an American multinational corporation engaged in hydrocarbon exploration. It is based in the Energy Corridor district of Houston, Texas.

Gran Tierra Energy Inc

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

Gran Tierra Energy Inc., is dedicated to the exploration and production of oil and gas properties in Colombia and Ecuador. The company is headquartered in Calgary, Canada.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?