WallStSmart

Diamondback Energy Inc (FANG)vsHumana Inc (HUM)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Humana Inc generates 860% more annual revenue ($137.20B vs $14.29B). FANG leads profitability with a 11.6% profit margin vs 0.8%. HUM appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.33. HUM earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 59/100 (C).

FANG

Hold

43

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 5.3Profit: 4.0Value: 5.3Quality: 3.3
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 1.24

HUM

Buy

59

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 6.0Profit: 4.5Value: 7.3Quality: 7.5
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 4.37
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FANGUndervalued (+44.0%)

Margin of Safety

+44.0%

Fair Value

$301.99

Current Price

$195.08

$106.91 discount

UndervaluedFair: $301.99Overvalued
HUMUndervalued (+81.0%)

Margin of Safety

+81.0%

Fair Value

$1141.73

Current Price

$246.33

$895.40 discount

UndervaluedFair: $1141.73Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FANG3 strengths · Avg: 8.3/10
Market CapQuality
$60.11B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Price/BookValuation
1.5x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.40B8/10

Generating 1.4B in free cash flow

HUM4 strengths · Avg: 8.5/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
4.3710/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Price/BookValuation
1.7x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Revenue GrowthGrowth
23.5%8/10

Revenue surging 23.5% year-over-year

Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.13B8/10

Generating 1.1B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

FANG4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
36.2x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Return on EquityProfitability
3.7%3/10

ROE of 3.7% — below average capital efficiency

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
55.522/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

HUM4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Return on EquityProfitability
6.3%3/10

ROE of 6.3% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
0.8%3/10

0.8% margin — thin

Operating MarginProfitability
4.7%3/10

Operating margin of 4.7%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-4.6%2/10

Earnings declined 4.6%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FANG

The strongest argument for FANG centers on Market Cap, Price/Book, Free Cash Flow.

Bull Case : HUM

The strongest argument for HUM centers on Altman Z-Score, Price/Book, Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 23.5% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 1.33 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : FANG

The primary concerns for FANG are P/E Ratio, Return on Equity, Piotroski F-Score.

Bear Case : HUM

The primary concerns for HUM are Return on Equity, Profit Margin, Operating Margin. Thin 0.8% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FANG profiles as a declining stock while HUM is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

HUM carries more volatility with a beta of 0.45 — expect wider price swings.

HUM is growing revenue faster at 23.5% — sustainability is the question.

FANG generates stronger free cash flow (1.4B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

HUM scores higher overall (59/100 vs 43/100) and 23.5% revenue growth. FANG offers better value entry with a 44.0% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Diamondback Energy Inc

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

Diamondback Energy is a company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration and headquartered in Midland, Texas.

Humana Inc

HEALTHCARE · HEALTHCARE PLANS · USA

Humana Inc. is a for-profit American health insurance company based in Louisville, Kentucky.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?