WallStSmart

Diamondback Energy Inc (FANG)vsMach Natural Resources LP (MNR)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Diamondback Energy Inc generates 1151% more annual revenue ($16.25B vs $1.30B). FANG leads profitability with a 9.0% profit margin vs 7.8%. MNR trades at a lower P/E of 23.6x. FANG earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 69/100 (B-).

FANG

Strong Buy

69

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 9.3Profit: 6.0Value: 5.3Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 1.28

MNR

Buy

58

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 6.0Profit: 6.5Value: 4.3Quality: 4.3
Piotroski: 2/9
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FANGUndervalued (+47.1%)

Margin of Safety

+47.1%

Fair Value

$319.39

Current Price

$200.52

$118.87 discount

UndervaluedFair: $319.39Overvalued
MNRSignificantly Overvalued (-31.5%)

Margin of Safety

-31.5%

Fair Value

$9.91

Current Price

$12.55

$2.64 premium

UndervaluedFair: $9.91Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FANG6 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Price/BookValuation
1.5x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Operating MarginProfitability
48.5%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 48.5%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
52.5%10/10

Revenue surging 52.5% year-over-year

EPS GrowthGrowth
179.5%10/10

Earnings expanding 179.5% YoY

Market CapQuality
$57.77B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Free Cash FlowQuality
$2.59B8/10

Generating 2.6B in free cash flow

MNR3 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.1x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Operating MarginProfitability
33.7%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 33.7%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
63.6%10/10

Revenue surging 63.6% year-over-year

Areas to Watch

FANG4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
38.6x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Return on EquityProfitability
4.2%3/10

ROE of 4.2% — below average capital efficiency

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
21.432/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

MNR3 concerns · Avg: 2.7/10
Profit MarginProfitability
7.8%3/10

7.8% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

EPS GrowthGrowth
-23.5%2/10

Earnings declined 23.5%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FANG

The strongest argument for FANG centers on Price/Book, Operating Margin, Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 52.5% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : MNR

The strongest argument for MNR centers on Price/Book, Operating Margin, Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 63.6% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : FANG

The primary concerns for FANG are P/E Ratio, Return on Equity, Piotroski F-Score.

Bear Case : MNR

The primary concerns for MNR are Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score, EPS Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FANG carries more volatility with a beta of 0.42 — expect wider price swings.

MNR is growing revenue faster at 63.6% — sustainability is the question.

FANG generates stronger free cash flow (2.6B), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor OIL & GAS E&P industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

FANG scores higher overall (69/100 vs 58/100) and 52.5% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Diamondback Energy Inc

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

Diamondback Energy is a company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration and headquartered in Midland, Texas.

Mach Natural Resources LP

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

Monmouth Real Estate Investment Corporation, founded in 1968, is one of the oldest public equity REITs in the world.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?