WallStSmart

ConocoPhillips (COP)vsMach Natural Resources LP (MNR)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

ConocoPhillips generates 5666% more annual revenue ($60.28B vs $1.05B). MNR leads profitability with a 13.7% profit margin vs 13.3%. MNR trades at a lower P/E of 12.8x. MNR earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 66/100 (B-).

COP

Hold

48

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 2.0Profit: 6.5Value: 4.7Quality: 5.0

MNR

Strong Buy

66

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 8.0Profit: 7.0Value: 8.3Quality: 5.8
Piotroski: 3/9
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

COPSignificantly Overvalued (-157.1%)

Margin of Safety

-157.1%

Fair Value

$43.25

Current Price

$128.93

$85.68 premium

UndervaluedFair: $43.25Overvalued
MNRUndervalued (+72.3%)

Margin of Safety

+72.3%

Fair Value

$47.00

Current Price

$14.01

$32.99 discount

UndervaluedFair: $47.00Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

COP3 strengths · Avg: 8.3/10
Market CapQuality
$157.60B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Price/BookValuation
2.4x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.29B8/10

Generating 1.3B in free cash flow

MNR5 strengths · Avg: 9.2/10
Price/BookValuation
1.2x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Operating MarginProfitability
30.6%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 30.6%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
36.8%10/10

Revenue surging 36.8% year-over-year

P/E RatioValuation
12.8x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

EPS GrowthGrowth
22.7%8/10

Earnings expanding 22.7% YoY

Areas to Watch

COP3 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
4.222/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-6.8%2/10

Revenue declined 6.8%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-39.0%2/10

Earnings declined 39.0%

MNR2 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-57.23M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : COP

The strongest argument for COP centers on Market Cap, Price/Book, Free Cash Flow.

Bull Case : MNR

The strongest argument for MNR centers on Price/Book, Operating Margin, Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 36.8% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : COP

The primary concerns for COP are PEG Ratio, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth.

Bear Case : MNR

The primary concerns for MNR are Piotroski F-Score, Free Cash Flow.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

COP profiles as a declining stock while MNR is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

COP carries more volatility with a beta of 0.28 — expect wider price swings.

MNR is growing revenue faster at 36.8% — sustainability is the question.

COP generates stronger free cash flow (1.3B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

MNR scores higher overall (66/100 vs 48/100) and 36.8% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

ConocoPhillips

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

ConocoPhillips is an American multinational corporation engaged in hydrocarbon exploration. It is based in the Energy Corridor district of Houston, Texas.

Mach Natural Resources LP

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

Monmouth Real Estate Investment Corporation, founded in 1968, is one of the oldest public equity REITs in the world.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?