Diamondback Energy Inc (FANG)vsMexco Energy Corporation (MXC)
FANG
Diamondback Energy Inc
$192.62
-5.09%
ENERGY · Cap: $56.94B
MXC
Mexco Energy Corporation
$8.82
+0.23%
ENERGY · Cap: $18.07M
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
Diamondback Energy Inc generates 208770% more annual revenue ($14.46B vs $6.92M). MXC leads profitability with a 18.1% profit margin vs 2.0%. MXC appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.63. MXC earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 47/100 (D+).
FANG
Hold41
out of 100
Grade: D
MXC
Hold47
out of 100
Grade: D+
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Margin of Safety
+41.1%
Fair Value
$286.80
Current Price
$192.62
$94.18 discount
Intrinsic value data unavailable for MXC.
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Reasonable price relative to book value
Large-cap with strong market position
Reasonable price relative to book value
Conservative balance sheet, low leverage
Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk
Growing faster than its price suggests
Attractively priced relative to earnings
Areas to Watch
4.2% revenue growth
ROE of 1.1% — below average capital efficiency
2.0% margin — thin
Weak financial health signals
Smaller company, higher risk/reward
ROE of 6.7% — below average capital efficiency
Revenue declined 26.8%
Earnings declined 90.9%
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : FANG
The strongest argument for FANG centers on Price/Book, Market Cap.
Bull Case : MXC
The strongest argument for MXC centers on Price/Book, Debt/Equity, Altman Z-Score. Profitability is solid with margins at 18.1% and operating margin at 6.6%. PEG of 0.63 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.
Bear Case : FANG
The primary concerns for FANG are Revenue Growth, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. A P/E of 208.7x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 2.0% margins leave little buffer for downturns.
Bear Case : MXC
The primary concerns for MXC are Market Cap, Return on Equity, Revenue Growth.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
FANG profiles as a value stock while MXC is a declining play — different risk/reward profiles.
FANG carries more volatility with a beta of 0.44 — expect wider price swings.
FANG is growing revenue faster at 4.2% — sustainability is the question.
FANG generates stronger free cash flow (895M), providing more financial flexibility.
Bottom Line
MXC scores higher overall (47/100 vs 41/100), backed by strong 18.1% margins. FANG offers better value entry with a 41.1% margin of safety. Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
Diamondback Energy Inc
ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA
Diamondback Energy is a company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration and headquartered in Midland, Texas.
Mexco Energy Corporation
ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA
Mexco Energy Corporation, an independent oil and gas company, is engaged in the acquisition, exploration, development, and production of natural gas, crude oil, condensate, and natural gas liquids in the United States. The company is headquartered in Midland, Texas.
Compare with Other OIL & GAS E&P Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?