WallStSmart

ConocoPhillips (COP)vsMexco Energy Corporation (MXC)

VS
⚡

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

ConocoPhillips generates 949558% more annual revenue ($64.46B vs $6.79M). MXC leads profitability with a 23.1% profit margin vs 14.4%. MXC appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.63. COP earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 78/100 (B+).

COP

Strong Buy

78

out of 100

Grade: B+

Growth: 7.3Profit: 7.0Value: 6.3Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 2.36

MXC

Strong Buy

68

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 6.0Profit: 7.0Value: 7.0Quality: 8.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 5.40

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

COP6 strengths · Avg: 9.2/10
Operating MarginProfitability
31.5%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 31.5%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
35.5%10/10

Revenue surging 35.5% year-over-year

EPS GrowthGrowth
107.0%10/10

Earnings expanding 107.0% YoY

Market CapQuality
$155.39B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

P/E RatioValuation
17.0x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
2.4x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

MXC6 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Price/BookValuation
1.0x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
103.0%10/10

Earnings expanding 103.0% YoY

Debt/EquityHealth
0.0010/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
5.4010/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Profit MarginProfitability
23.1%9/10

Keeps 23 of every $100 in revenue as profit

PEG RatioValuation
0.638/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Areas to Watch

COP0 concerns · Avg: 0/10

No major concerns identified

MXC3 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Market CapQuality
$20.40M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
6.7%3/10

ROE of 6.7% — below average capital efficiency

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : COP

The strongest argument for COP centers on Operating Margin, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth. Revenue growth of 35.5% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 1.08 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : MXC

The strongest argument for MXC centers on Price/Book, EPS Growth, Debt/Equity. Profitability is solid with margins at 23.1% and operating margin at 28.6%. Revenue growth of 12.9% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : COP

No major red flags identified for COP, but monitor valuation.

Bear Case : MXC

The primary concerns for MXC are Market Cap, Return on Equity, Piotroski F-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

COP profiles as a growth stock while MXC is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.

MXC carries more volatility with a beta of 0.34 — expect wider price swings.

COP is growing revenue faster at 35.5% — sustainability is the question.

COP generates stronger free cash flow (4.4B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

COP scores higher overall (78/100 vs 68/100) and 35.5% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Strong Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

ConocoPhillips

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

ConocoPhillips is an American multinational corporation engaged in hydrocarbon exploration. It is based in the Energy Corridor district of Houston, Texas.

Mexco Energy Corporation

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

Mexco Energy Corporation, an independent oil and gas company, is engaged in the acquisition, exploration, development, and production of natural gas, crude oil, condensate, and natural gas liquids in the United States. The company is headquartered in Midland, Texas.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?