Diamondback Energy Inc (FANG)vsNatera Inc (NTRA)
FANG
Diamondback Energy Inc
$188.70
-0.92%
ENERGY · Cap: $53.58B
NTRA
Natera Inc
$194.24
-11.64%
HEALTHCARE · Cap: $30.71B
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
Diamondback Energy Inc generates 528% more annual revenue ($14.47B vs $2.31B). FANG leads profitability with a 2.0% profit margin vs -9.0%. FANG earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 41/100 (D).
FANG
Hold41
out of 100
Grade: D
NTRA
Avoid31
out of 100
Grade: F
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Margin of Safety
+44.7%
Fair Value
$305.77
Current Price
$188.70
$117.07 discount
Intrinsic value data unavailable for NTRA.
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Reasonable price relative to book value
Large-cap with strong market position
Revenue surging 39.8% year-over-year
Areas to Watch
ROE of 0.5% — below average capital efficiency
2.0% margin — thin
Weak financial health signals
Expensive relative to growth rate
Trading at 15.8x book value
0.0% earnings growth
ROE of -14.3% — below average capital efficiency
Currently unprofitable
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : FANG
The strongest argument for FANG centers on Price/Book, Market Cap.
Bull Case : NTRA
The strongest argument for NTRA centers on Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 39.8% demonstrates continued momentum.
Bear Case : FANG
The primary concerns for FANG are Return on Equity, Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score. A P/E of 196.3x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 2.0% margins leave little buffer for downturns.
Bear Case : NTRA
The primary concerns for NTRA are Price/Book, EPS Growth, Return on Equity.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
FANG profiles as a value stock while NTRA is a hypergrowth play — different risk/reward profiles.
NTRA carries more volatility with a beta of 1.57 — expect wider price swings.
NTRA is growing revenue faster at 39.8% — sustainability is the question.
FANG generates stronger free cash flow (895M), providing more financial flexibility.
Bottom Line
FANG scores higher overall (41/100 vs 31/100). Both earn "Hold" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
Diamondback Energy Inc
ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA
Diamondback Energy is a company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration and headquartered in Midland, Texas.
Natera Inc
HEALTHCARE · DIAGNOSTICS & RESEARCH · USA
Natera, Inc., a diagnostic company, develops and markets molecular testing services globally. The company is headquartered in San Carlos, California.
Compare with Other OIL & GAS E&P Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?