WallStSmart

Diamondback Energy Inc (FANG)vsQuanta Services Inc (PWR)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Quanta Services Inc generates 111% more annual revenue ($30.12B vs $14.29B). FANG leads profitability with a 11.6% profit margin vs 3.7%. PWR appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 2.43. PWR earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 54/100 (C-).

FANG

Hold

43

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 5.3Profit: 4.0Value: 5.3Quality: 3.3
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 1.24

PWR

Buy

54

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 8.7Profit: 5.0Value: 3.7Quality: 5.0
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FANGUndervalued (+44.0%)

Margin of Safety

+44.0%

Fair Value

$301.99

Current Price

$195.08

$106.91 discount

UndervaluedFair: $301.99Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for PWR.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FANG3 strengths · Avg: 8.3/10
Market CapQuality
$60.11B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Price/BookValuation
1.5x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.40B8/10

Generating 1.4B in free cash flow

PWR3 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
51.0%10/10

Earnings expanding 51.0% YoY

Market CapQuality
$113.65B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Revenue GrowthGrowth
26.3%8/10

Revenue surging 26.3% year-over-year

Areas to Watch

FANG4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
36.2x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Return on EquityProfitability
3.7%3/10

ROE of 3.7% — below average capital efficiency

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
55.522/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

PWR4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.434/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Price/BookValuation
13.1x4/10

Trading at 13.1x book value

Profit MarginProfitability
3.7%3/10

3.7% margin — thin

Operating MarginProfitability
4.2%3/10

Operating margin of 4.2%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FANG

The strongest argument for FANG centers on Market Cap, Price/Book, Free Cash Flow.

Bull Case : PWR

The strongest argument for PWR centers on EPS Growth, Market Cap, Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 26.3% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : FANG

The primary concerns for FANG are P/E Ratio, Return on Equity, Piotroski F-Score.

Bear Case : PWR

The primary concerns for PWR are PEG Ratio, Price/Book, Profit Margin. A P/E of 102.1x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 3.7% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FANG profiles as a declining stock while PWR is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

PWR carries more volatility with a beta of 1.24 — expect wider price swings.

PWR is growing revenue faster at 26.3% — sustainability is the question.

FANG generates stronger free cash flow (1.4B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

PWR scores higher overall (54/100 vs 43/100) and 26.3% revenue growth. FANG offers better value entry with a 44.0% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Diamondback Energy Inc

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

Diamondback Energy is a company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration and headquartered in Midland, Texas.

Quanta Services Inc

INDUSTRIALS · ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION · USA

Quanta Services is an American corporation that provides infrastructure services for electric power, pipeline, industrial and communications industries. Capabilities include the planning, design, installation, program management, maintenance and repair of most types of network infrastructure.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?