WallStSmart

ConocoPhillips (COP)vsQuanta Services Inc (PWR)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

ConocoPhillips generates 97% more annual revenue ($59.38B vs $30.12B). COP leads profitability with a 12.3% profit margin vs 3.7%. COP appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.22. COP earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 56/100 (C).

COP

Buy

56

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 2.0Profit: 6.5Value: 4.7Quality: 5.0

PWR

Buy

54

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 8.7Profit: 5.0Value: 3.7Quality: 5.0
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

COPSignificantly Overvalued (-50.4%)

Margin of Safety

-50.4%

Fair Value

$73.94

Current Price

$118.90

$44.96 premium

UndervaluedFair: $73.94Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for PWR.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

COP4 strengths · Avg: 8.3/10
Market CapQuality
$152.18B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Price/BookValuation
2.2x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Operating MarginProfitability
22.1%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 22.1%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.35B8/10

Generating 1.3B in free cash flow

PWR3 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
51.0%10/10

Earnings expanding 51.0% YoY

Market CapQuality
$113.65B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Revenue GrowthGrowth
26.3%8/10

Revenue surging 26.3% year-over-year

Areas to Watch

COP2 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
-5.3%2/10

Revenue declined 5.3%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-20.2%2/10

Earnings declined 20.2%

PWR4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.434/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Price/BookValuation
13.1x4/10

Trading at 13.1x book value

Profit MarginProfitability
3.7%3/10

3.7% margin — thin

Operating MarginProfitability
4.2%3/10

Operating margin of 4.2%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : COP

The strongest argument for COP centers on Market Cap, Price/Book, Operating Margin. PEG of 1.22 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : PWR

The strongest argument for PWR centers on EPS Growth, Market Cap, Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 26.3% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : COP

The primary concerns for COP are Revenue Growth, EPS Growth.

Bear Case : PWR

The primary concerns for PWR are PEG Ratio, Price/Book, Profit Margin. A P/E of 102.1x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 3.7% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

COP profiles as a declining stock while PWR is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

PWR carries more volatility with a beta of 1.24 — expect wider price swings.

PWR is growing revenue faster at 26.3% — sustainability is the question.

COP generates stronger free cash flow (1.3B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

COP scores higher overall (56/100 vs 54/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

ConocoPhillips

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

ConocoPhillips is an American multinational corporation engaged in hydrocarbon exploration. It is based in the Energy Corridor district of Houston, Texas.

Quanta Services Inc

INDUSTRIALS · ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION · USA

Quanta Services is an American corporation that provides infrastructure services for electric power, pipeline, industrial and communications industries. Capabilities include the planning, design, installation, program management, maintenance and repair of most types of network infrastructure.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?