WallStSmart

Funko Inc (FNKO)vsMattel Inc (MAT)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Mattel Inc generates 486% more annual revenue ($5.38B vs $918.39M). MAT leads profitability with a 9.3% profit margin vs -6.3%. MAT earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 56/100 (C).

FNKO

Hold

36

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 3.3Profit: 2.0Value: 6.7Quality: 4.0
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 1.05

MAT

Buy

56

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 2.7Profit: 5.5Value: 8.0Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.56
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FNKOUndervalued (+54.7%)

Margin of Safety

+54.7%

Fair Value

$8.54

Current Price

$5.22

$3.32 discount

UndervaluedFair: $8.54Overvalued
MATUndervalued (+21.7%)

Margin of Safety

+21.7%

Fair Value

$20.18

Current Price

$14.08

$6.10 discount

UndervaluedFair: $20.18Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FNKO1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.7x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

MAT3 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
9.4x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Return on EquityProfitability
23.7%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 24 in profit

Price/BookValuation
1.9x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

FNKO4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Market CapQuality
$284.78M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Debt/EquityHealth
1.643/10

Elevated debt levels

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-30.4%2/10

ROE of -30.4% — below average capital efficiency

MAT4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
4.3%4/10

4.3% revenue growth

Debt/EquityHealth
1.233/10

Elevated debt levels

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

EPS GrowthGrowth
-18.5%2/10

Earnings declined 18.5%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FNKO

The strongest argument for FNKO centers on Price/Book.

Bull Case : MAT

The strongest argument for MAT centers on P/E Ratio, Return on Equity, Price/Book. PEG of 1.16 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : FNKO

The primary concerns for FNKO are Market Cap, Debt/Equity, Piotroski F-Score. Debt-to-equity of 1.64 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : MAT

The primary concerns for MAT are Revenue Growth, Debt/Equity, Piotroski F-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FNKO profiles as a turnaround stock while MAT is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

FNKO carries more volatility with a beta of 0.94 — expect wider price swings.

FNKO is growing revenue faster at 5.3% — sustainability is the question.

FNKO generates stronger free cash flow (2M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

MAT scores higher overall (56/100 vs 36/100). FNKO offers better value entry with a 54.7% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Funko Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · LEISURE · USA

Funko, Inc., a pop culture consumer products company, designs, sources, and distributes licensed pop culture products in the United States, Europe, and internationally. The company is headquartered in Everett, Washington.

Mattel Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · LEISURE · USA

Mattel, Inc., a children's entertainment company, designs and produces toys and consumer products worldwide. The company is headquartered in El Segundo, California.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?