WallStSmart

Five Point Holdings LLC (FPH)vsRenX Enterprises Corp. (RENX)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Five Point Holdings LLC generates 3801% more annual revenue ($193.90M vs $4.97M). FPH leads profitability with a 48.6% profit margin vs -2.8%. FPH earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 52/100 (C-).

FPH

Buy

52

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 5.3Profit: 5.5Value: 8.3Quality: 6.8
Piotroski: 1/9

RENX

Avoid

31

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 6.3Profit: 2.0Value: 5.0Quality: 3.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: -3.92
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FPHUndervalued (+91.3%)

Margin of Safety

+91.3%

Fair Value

$60.84

Current Price

$4.93

$55.91 discount

UndervaluedFair: $60.84Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for RENX.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FPH3 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
4.8x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
0.4x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Profit MarginProfitability
48.6%10/10

Keeps 49 of every $100 in revenue as profit

RENX2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Price/BookValuation
0.3x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Revenue GrowthGrowth
42.3%10/10

Revenue surging 42.3% year-over-year

Areas to Watch

FPH4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
3.2%4/10

3.2% earnings growth

Market CapQuality
$918.56M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-20.7%2/10

Revenue declined 20.7%

RENX4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Market CapQuality
$6.44M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
-9.8%2/10

ROE of -9.8% — below average capital efficiency

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-671,9812/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FPH

The strongest argument for FPH centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book, Profit Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 48.6% and operating margin at -58.5%.

Bull Case : RENX

The strongest argument for RENX centers on Price/Book, Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 42.3% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : FPH

The primary concerns for FPH are EPS Growth, Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score.

Bear Case : RENX

The primary concerns for RENX are EPS Growth, Market Cap, Return on Equity. Debt-to-equity of 14.28 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FPH profiles as a declining stock while RENX is a hypergrowth play — different risk/reward profiles.

RENX carries more volatility with a beta of 3.87 — expect wider price swings.

RENX is growing revenue faster at 42.3% — sustainability is the question.

FPH generates stronger free cash flow (80M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

FPH scores higher overall (52/100 vs 31/100), backed by strong 48.6% margins. Both earn "Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Five Point Holdings LLC

REAL ESTATE · REAL ESTATE - DEVELOPMENT · USA

Five Point Holdings, LLC, through its subsidiary, Five Point Operating Company, LP, designs and develops planned and mixed-use communities in Orange, Los Angeles and San Francisco counties. The company is headquartered in Irvine, California.

Visit Website →

RenX Enterprises Corp.

REAL ESTATE · REAL ESTATE - DEVELOPMENT · USA

RELX NV, through its interest in RELX Group plc, provides information and analysis for professional and commercial clients in all industries globally. The company is headquartered in Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?