Goldman Sachs Group Inc (GS)vsMitsubishi UFJ Financial Group Inc ADR (MUFG)
GS
Goldman Sachs Group Inc
$1,039.61
+0.68%
FINANCIAL SERVICES · Cap: $312.82B
MUFG
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group Inc ADR
$22.49
-0.13%
FINANCIAL SERVICES · Cap: $253.17B
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group Inc ADR generates 9833% more annual revenue ($6.71T vs $67.57B). GS leads profitability with a 31.0% profit margin vs 25.8%. GS appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.49. GS earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 83/100 (A-).
GS
Exceptional Buy83
out of 100
Grade: A-
MUFG
Strong Buy71
out of 100
Grade: B
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Mega-cap, among the largest globally
Keeps 31 of every $100 in revenue as profit
Strong operational efficiency at 42.2%
Revenue surging 42.5% year-over-year
Earnings expanding 92.3% YoY
Attractively priced relative to earnings
Mega-cap, among the largest globally
Strong operational efficiency at 116.9%
Generating 8.1T in free cash flow
Keeps 26 of every $100 in revenue as profit
Attractively priced relative to earnings
Reasonable price relative to book value
Areas to Watch
Negative free cash flow — burning cash
Distress zone — elevated risk
Elevated debt levels
Expensive relative to growth rate
Distress zone — elevated risk
Elevated debt levels
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : GS
The strongest argument for GS centers on Market Cap, Profit Margin, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 31.0% and operating margin at 42.2%. Revenue growth of 42.5% demonstrates continued momentum.
Bull Case : MUFG
The strongest argument for MUFG centers on Market Cap, Operating Margin, Free Cash Flow. Profitability is solid with margins at 25.8% and operating margin at 116.9%. Revenue growth of 11.7% demonstrates continued momentum.
Bear Case : GS
The primary concerns for GS are Free Cash Flow, Altman Z-Score, Debt/Equity. Debt-to-equity of 6.47 is elevated, increasing financial risk.
Bear Case : MUFG
The primary concerns for MUFG are PEG Ratio, Altman Z-Score, Debt/Equity. Debt-to-equity of 3.52 is elevated, increasing financial risk.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
GS profiles as a growth stock while MUFG is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.
GS carries more volatility with a beta of 1.29 — expect wider price swings.
GS is growing revenue faster at 42.5% — sustainability is the question.
MUFG generates stronger free cash flow (8.1T), providing more financial flexibility.
Bottom Line
GS scores higher overall (83/100 vs 71/100), backed by strong 31.0% margins and 42.5% revenue growth. Both earn "Exceptional Buy" and "Strong Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
Goldman Sachs Group Inc
FINANCIAL SERVICES · CAPITAL MARKETS · USA
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., is an American multinational investment bank and financial services company headquartered in New York City. It offers services in investment management, securities, asset management, prime brokerage, and securities underwriting. It also provides investment banking to institutional investors.
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group Inc ADR
FINANCIAL SERVICES · BANKS - DIVERSIFIED · USA
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc., a banking holding company, offers financial services in Japan, the United States, and Asia / Oceania. The company is headquartered in Tokyo, Japan.
Visit Website →Compare with Other CAPITAL MARKETS Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?