WallStSmart

FST Corp. Ordinary Shares (KBSX)vsMattel Inc (MAT)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Mattel Inc generates 10280% more annual revenue ($5.38B vs $51.86M). MAT leads profitability with a 9.3% profit margin vs 6.1%. MAT trades at a lower P/E of 9.4x. MAT earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 56/100 (C).

KBSX

Hold

46

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 5.3Profit: 4.0Value: 6.0Quality: 2.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 0.49

MAT

Buy

56

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 2.7Profit: 5.5Value: 8.0Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.56
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for KBSX.

MATUndervalued (+21.7%)

Margin of Safety

+21.7%

Fair Value

$20.18

Current Price

$14.08

$6.10 discount

UndervaluedFair: $20.18Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

KBSX2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
36.2%10/10

Revenue surging 36.2% year-over-year

P/E RatioValuation
17.9x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

MAT3 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
9.4x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Return on EquityProfitability
23.7%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 24 in profit

Price/BookValuation
1.9x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

KBSX4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Market CapQuality
$56.24M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Profit MarginProfitability
6.1%3/10

6.1% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

MAT4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
4.3%4/10

4.3% revenue growth

Debt/EquityHealth
1.233/10

Elevated debt levels

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

EPS GrowthGrowth
-18.5%2/10

Earnings declined 18.5%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : KBSX

The strongest argument for KBSX centers on Revenue Growth, P/E Ratio. Revenue growth of 36.2% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : MAT

The strongest argument for MAT centers on P/E Ratio, Return on Equity, Price/Book. PEG of 1.16 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : KBSX

The primary concerns for KBSX are EPS Growth, Market Cap, Profit Margin. Debt-to-equity of 2.08 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : MAT

The primary concerns for MAT are Revenue Growth, Debt/Equity, Piotroski F-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

KBSX profiles as a hypergrowth stock while MAT is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

MAT carries more volatility with a beta of 0.73 — expect wider price swings.

KBSX is growing revenue faster at 36.2% — sustainability is the question.

KBSX generates stronger free cash flow (-633,550), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

MAT scores higher overall (56/100 vs 46/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

FST Corp. Ordinary Shares

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · LEISURE · USA

FST Corp. The company is headquartered in Chiayi, Taiwan.

Mattel Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · LEISURE · USA

Mattel, Inc., a children's entertainment company, designs and produces toys and consumer products worldwide. The company is headquartered in El Segundo, California.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?