WallStSmart

Mattel Inc (MAT)vsNOMADAR Corp. Class A Common Stock (NOMA)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Mattel Inc generates 603680% more annual revenue ($5.35B vs $885,690). MAT leads profitability with a 7.4% profit margin vs -2.1%. MAT earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 58/100 (C).

MAT

Buy

58

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 3.3Profit: 6.0Value: 7.3Quality: 5.8
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.54

NOMA

Avoid

14

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 4.3Profit: 3.0Value: 5.0Quality: 5.0
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

MATSignificantly Overvalued (-87.4%)

Margin of Safety

-87.4%

Fair Value

$8.43

Current Price

$14.87

$6.44 premium

UndervaluedFair: $8.43Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for NOMA.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

MAT2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
12.0x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
2.0x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

NOMA0 strengths · Avg: 0/10

No standout strengths identified

Areas to Watch

MAT3 concerns · Avg: 2.7/10
Profit MarginProfitability
7.4%3/10

7.4% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

EPS GrowthGrowth
-18.5%2/10

Earnings declined 18.5%

NOMA4 concerns · Avg: 3.8/10
Price/BookValuation
9.5x4/10

Trading at 9.5x book value

Revenue GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% revenue growth

EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Market CapQuality
$62.51M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : MAT

The strongest argument for MAT centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book. PEG of 1.44 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : NOMA

NOMA has a balanced fundamental profile.

Bear Case : MAT

The primary concerns for MAT are Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score, EPS Growth.

Bear Case : NOMA

The primary concerns for NOMA are Price/Book, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

MAT profiles as a value stock while NOMA is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.

MAT is growing revenue faster at 7.3% — sustainability is the question.

MAT generates stronger free cash flow (739M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor LEISURE industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

MAT scores higher overall (58/100 vs 14/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Mattel Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · LEISURE · USA

Mattel, Inc., a children's entertainment company, designs and produces toys and consumer products worldwide. The company is headquartered in El Segundo, California.

NOMADAR Corp. Class A Common Stock

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · LEISURE · USA

Nomadar Corp. (NOMA) is a pioneering force in the travel technology industry, committed to revolutionizing customer experiences through cutting-edge digital platforms and efficient travel management solutions. With a diverse portfolio designed to adapt to the dynamic needs of travelers and businesses, Nomadar is well-positioned to leverage the growing demand for technology-driven travel services. Backed by a seasoned leadership team and robust partnerships, the company adeptly navigates market trends to foster sustainable growth. As Nomadar enhances its footprint in the global travel sector, it remains steadfast in its mission to deliver innovative, customer-focused solutions that bolster shareholder value.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?