WallStSmart

MEDIFAST INC (MED)vsRollins Inc (ROL)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Rollins Inc generates 1011% more annual revenue ($3.84B vs $346.10M). ROL leads profitability with a 13.8% profit margin vs -5.8%. MED appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.97. ROL earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 52/100 (C-).

MED

Hold

45

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 2.0Profit: 2.0Value: 6.0Quality: 8.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 4.98

ROL

Buy

52

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 6.0Profit: 8.5Value: 5.3Quality: 5.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.64
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for MED.

ROLUndervalued (+30.2%)

Margin of Safety

+30.2%

Fair Value

$67.65

Current Price

$46.51

$21.14 discount

UndervaluedFair: $67.65Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

MED4 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Price/BookValuation
0.6x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Debt/EquityHealth
0.0810/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
4.9810/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

PEG RatioValuation
0.978/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

ROL1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Return on EquityProfitability
38.3%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 38 in profit

Areas to Watch

MED4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Market CapQuality
$134.54M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-10.1%2/10

ROE of -10.1% — below average capital efficiency

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-34.3%2/10

Revenue declined 34.3%

ROL4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
Price/BookValuation
16.3x4/10

Trading at 16.3x book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
1.3%4/10

1.3% earnings growth

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
3.402/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : MED

The strongest argument for MED centers on Price/Book, Debt/Equity, Altman Z-Score. PEG of 0.97 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : ROL

The strongest argument for ROL centers on Return on Equity. Revenue growth of 10.2% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : MED

The primary concerns for MED are Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score, Return on Equity.

Bear Case : ROL

The primary concerns for ROL are Price/Book, EPS Growth, Piotroski F-Score. A P/E of 43.3x leaves little room for execution misses.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

MED profiles as a turnaround stock while ROL is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

ROL carries more volatility with a beta of 0.73 — expect wider price swings.

ROL is growing revenue faster at 10.2% — sustainability is the question.

ROL generates stronger free cash flow (111M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

ROL scores higher overall (52/100 vs 45/100) and 10.2% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

MEDIFAST INC

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · PERSONAL SERVICES · USA

Medifast, Inc. manufactures and distributes weight loss, weight management, healthy living products, and other consumable health and nutrition products in the United States and Asia-Pacific. The company is headquartered in Baltimore, Maryland.

Visit Website →

Rollins Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · PERSONAL SERVICES · USA

Rollins, Inc. is a North American consumer and commercial services company.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?