WallStSmart

MEDIFAST INC (MED)vsRollins Inc (ROL)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Rollins Inc generates 1138% more annual revenue ($3.92B vs $316.93M). ROL leads profitability with a 13.6% profit margin vs -8.1%. MED appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.97. ROL earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 52/100 (C-).

MED

Hold

45

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 2.0Profit: 2.0Value: 6.0Quality: 8.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 5.09

ROL

Buy

52

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 6.0Profit: 8.0Value: 5.3Quality: 5.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.64
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for MED.

ROLUndervalued (+49.1%)

Margin of Safety

+49.1%

Fair Value

$67.90

Current Price

$34.73

$33.17 discount

UndervaluedFair: $67.90Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

MED4 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
Price/BookValuation
0.6x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
5.0910/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Debt/EquityHealth
0.149/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

PEG RatioValuation
0.978/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

ROL1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Return on EquityProfitability
37.2%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 37 in profit

Areas to Watch

MED4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Market CapQuality
$141.66M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-10.1%2/10

ROE of -10.1% — below average capital efficiency

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-27.6%2/10

Revenue declined 27.6%

ROL4 concerns · Avg: 3.8/10
P/E RatioValuation
31.8x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Price/BookValuation
11.7x4/10

Trading at 11.7x book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
3.1%4/10

3.1% earnings growth

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : MED

The strongest argument for MED centers on Price/Book, Altman Z-Score, Debt/Equity. PEG of 0.97 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : ROL

The strongest argument for ROL centers on Return on Equity.

Bear Case : MED

The primary concerns for MED are Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score, Return on Equity.

Bear Case : ROL

The primary concerns for ROL are P/E Ratio, Price/Book, EPS Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

MED profiles as a turnaround stock while ROL is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

ROL carries more volatility with a beta of 0.74 — expect wider price swings.

ROL is growing revenue faster at 7.9% — sustainability is the question.

ROL generates stronger free cash flow (166M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

ROL scores higher overall (52/100 vs 45/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

MEDIFAST INC

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · PERSONAL SERVICES · USA

Medifast, Inc. manufactures and distributes weight loss, weight management, healthy living products, and other consumable health and nutrition products in the United States and Asia-Pacific. The company is headquartered in Baltimore, Maryland.

Visit Website →

Rollins Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · PERSONAL SERVICES · USA

Rollins, Inc. is a North American consumer and commercial services company.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?