WallStSmart

Mesa Royalty Trust (MTR)vsWoodside Energy Group Ltd (WDS)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Woodside Energy Group Ltd generates 2083040% more annual revenue ($12.98B vs $623,290). MTR leads profitability with a 68.7% profit margin vs 20.9%. WDS trades at a lower P/E of 17.1x. MTR earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 58/100 (C).

MTR

Buy

58

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 7.3Profit: 8.5Value: 8.3Quality: 5.0

WDS

Buy

53

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 2.0Profit: 6.0Value: 7.3Quality: 4.8
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 1.37
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

MTRUndervalued (+55.5%)

Margin of Safety

+55.5%

Fair Value

$10.76

Current Price

$5.13

$5.63 discount

UndervaluedFair: $10.76Overvalued
WDSSignificantly Overvalued (-94.1%)

Margin of Safety

-94.1%

Fair Value

$9.66

Current Price

$23.66

$14.00 premium

UndervaluedFair: $9.66Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

MTR4 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Profit MarginProfitability
68.7%10/10

Keeps 69 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Operating MarginProfitability
59.2%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 59.2%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
40.1%10/10

Revenue surging 40.1% year-over-year

EPS GrowthGrowth
61.8%10/10

Earnings expanding 61.8% YoY

WDS3 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.3x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Profit MarginProfitability
20.9%9/10

Keeps 21 of every $100 in revenue as profit

P/E RatioValuation
17.1x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Areas to Watch

MTR1 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Market CapQuality
$9.69M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

WDS4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Return on EquityProfitability
7.2%3/10

ROE of 7.2% — below average capital efficiency

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-11.1%2/10

Revenue declined 11.1%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-14.4%2/10

Earnings declined 14.4%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : MTR

The strongest argument for MTR centers on Profit Margin, Operating Margin, Revenue Growth. Profitability is solid with margins at 68.7% and operating margin at 59.2%. Revenue growth of 40.1% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : WDS

The strongest argument for WDS centers on Price/Book, Profit Margin, P/E Ratio. Profitability is solid with margins at 20.9% and operating margin at 19.1%. PEG of 1.33 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : MTR

The primary concerns for MTR are Market Cap.

Bear Case : WDS

The primary concerns for WDS are Return on Equity, Piotroski F-Score, Revenue Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

MTR profiles as a growth stock while WDS is a declining play — different risk/reward profiles.

MTR carries more volatility with a beta of 0.52 — expect wider price swings.

MTR is growing revenue faster at 40.1% — sustainability is the question.

WDS generates stronger free cash flow (417M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

MTR scores higher overall (58/100 vs 53/100), backed by strong 68.7% margins and 40.1% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Mesa Royalty Trust

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

Mesa Royalty Trust owns net royalty interests in various oil and gas producing properties in the United States. The company is headquartered in Houston, Texas.

Woodside Energy Group Ltd

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

Woodside Energy Group Ltd is engaged in the exploration, evaluation, development, production, marketing and sale of hydrocarbons in Oceania, Asia, Canada, Africa and internationally. The company is headquartered in Perth, Australia.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?