Canadian Natural Resources Ltd (CNQ)vsMesa Royalty Trust (MTR)
CNQ
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd
$45.70
-3.23%
ENERGY · Cap: $91.79B
MTR
Mesa Royalty Trust
$3.81
-0.39%
ENERGY · Cap: $7.17M
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd generates 5658423% more annual revenue ($38.63B vs $682,740). MTR leads profitability with a 74.8% profit margin vs 25.1%. CNQ trades at a lower P/E of 11.8x. MTR earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 64/100 (C+).
CNQ
Buy58
out of 100
Grade: C
MTR
Buy64
out of 100
Grade: C+
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Margin of Safety
+50.8%
Fair Value
$83.51
Current Price
$45.70
$37.81 discount
Margin of Safety
-76.8%
Fair Value
$2.71
Current Price
$3.81
$1.10 premium
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Attractively priced relative to earnings
Every $100 of equity generates 30 in profit
Large-cap with strong market position
Keeps 25 of every $100 in revenue as profit
Reasonable price relative to book value
Strong operational efficiency at 21.8%
Keeps 75 of every $100 in revenue as profit
Strong operational efficiency at 90.4%
Revenue surging 58.8% year-over-year
Earnings expanding 132.9% YoY
Attractively priced relative to earnings
Reasonable price relative to book value
Areas to Watch
Expensive relative to growth rate
Revenue declined 1.2%
Earnings declined 45.3%
Smaller company, higher risk/reward
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : CNQ
The strongest argument for CNQ centers on P/E Ratio, Return on Equity, Market Cap. Profitability is solid with margins at 25.1% and operating margin at 21.8%.
Bull Case : MTR
The strongest argument for MTR centers on Profit Margin, Operating Margin, Revenue Growth. Profitability is solid with margins at 74.8% and operating margin at 90.4%. Revenue growth of 58.8% demonstrates continued momentum.
Bear Case : CNQ
The primary concerns for CNQ are PEG Ratio, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth.
Bear Case : MTR
The primary concerns for MTR are Market Cap.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
CNQ profiles as a declining stock while MTR is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.
CNQ carries more volatility with a beta of 0.88 — expect wider price swings.
MTR is growing revenue faster at 58.8% — sustainability is the question.
Monitor OIL & GAS E&P industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.
Bottom Line
MTR scores higher overall (64/100 vs 58/100), backed by strong 74.8% margins and 58.8% revenue growth. CNQ offers better value entry with a 50.8% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd
ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA
Canadian Natural Resources Limited acquires, explores, develops, produces, markets and sells crude oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids (NGL). The company is headquartered in Calgary, Canada.
Mesa Royalty Trust
ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA
Mesa Royalty Trust owns net royalty interests in various oil and gas producing properties in the United States. The company is headquartered in Houston, Texas.
Compare with Other OIL & GAS E&P Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?