WallStSmart

Canadian Natural Resources Ltd (CNQ)vsMesa Royalty Trust (MTR)

VS
⚡

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Canadian Natural Resources Ltd generates 8076406% more annual revenue ($44.68B vs $553,160). MTR leads profitability with a 66.0% profit margin vs 26.3%. CNQ trades at a lower P/E of 11.9x. CNQ earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 81/100 (A-).

CNQ

Exceptional Buy

81

out of 100

Grade: A-

Growth: 7.3Profit: 9.0Value: 7.3Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 2.05

MTR

Hold

44

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 2.0Profit: 8.5Value: 5.0Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 4/9
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CNQUndervalued (+50.0%)

Margin of Safety

+50.0%

Fair Value

$95.86

Current Price

$47.41

$48.45 discount

UndervaluedFair: $95.86Overvalued
MTRSignificantly Overvalued (-80.8%)

Margin of Safety

-80.8%

Fair Value

$2.65

Current Price

$2.43

$0.22 premium

UndervaluedFair: $2.65Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CNQ6 strengths · Avg: 9.7/10
P/E RatioValuation
11.9x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Operating MarginProfitability
43.1%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 43.1%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
69.5%10/10

Revenue surging 69.5% year-over-year

EPS GrowthGrowth
83.8%10/10

Earnings expanding 83.8% YoY

Market CapQuality
$98.21B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Return on EquityProfitability
25.1%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 25 in profit

MTR4 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Price/BookValuation
1.4x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Profit MarginProfitability
66.0%10/10

Keeps 66 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Operating MarginProfitability
75.6%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 75.6%

P/E RatioValuation
12.3x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Areas to Watch

CNQ1 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
3.422/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

MTR3 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Market CapQuality
$4.57M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-28.4%2/10

Revenue declined 28.4%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-33.3%2/10

Earnings declined 33.3%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CNQ

The strongest argument for CNQ centers on P/E Ratio, Operating Margin, Revenue Growth. Profitability is solid with margins at 26.3% and operating margin at 43.1%. Revenue growth of 69.5% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : MTR

The strongest argument for MTR centers on Price/Book, Profit Margin, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 66.0% and operating margin at 75.6%.

Bear Case : CNQ

The primary concerns for CNQ are PEG Ratio.

Bear Case : MTR

The primary concerns for MTR are Market Cap, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CNQ profiles as a growth stock while MTR is a declining play — different risk/reward profiles.

CNQ carries more volatility with a beta of 0.88 — expect wider price swings.

CNQ is growing revenue faster at 69.5% — sustainability is the question.

Monitor OIL & GAS E&P industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

CNQ scores higher overall (81/100 vs 44/100), backed by strong 26.3% margins and 69.5% revenue growth. Both earn "Exceptional Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Canadian Natural Resources Ltd

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

Canadian Natural Resources Limited acquires, explores, develops, produces, markets and sells crude oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids (NGL). The company is headquartered in Calgary, Canada.

Mesa Royalty Trust

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

Mesa Royalty Trust owns net royalty interests in various oil and gas producing properties in the United States. The company is headquartered in Houston, Texas.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?