WallStSmart

Diamondback Energy Inc (FANG)vsMesa Royalty Trust (MTR)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Diamondback Energy Inc generates 2117690% more annual revenue ($14.46B vs $682,740). MTR leads profitability with a 74.8% profit margin vs 2.0%. MTR trades at a lower P/E of 16.7x. MTR earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 64/100 (C+).

FANG

Hold

41

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 4.7Profit: 4.0Value: 4.7Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 1.28

MTR

Buy

64

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 7.3Profit: 9.0Value: 5.0Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 4/9
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FANGUndervalued (+41.1%)

Margin of Safety

+41.1%

Fair Value

$286.80

Current Price

$192.62

$94.18 discount

UndervaluedFair: $286.80Overvalued
MTRSignificantly Overvalued (-76.8%)

Margin of Safety

-76.8%

Fair Value

$2.71

Current Price

$3.81

$1.10 premium

UndervaluedFair: $2.71Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FANG2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Price/BookValuation
1.5x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Market CapQuality
$53.44B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

MTR6 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
Profit MarginProfitability
74.8%10/10

Keeps 75 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Operating MarginProfitability
90.4%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 90.4%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
58.8%10/10

Revenue surging 58.8% year-over-year

EPS GrowthGrowth
132.9%10/10

Earnings expanding 132.9% YoY

P/E RatioValuation
16.7x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
2.2x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

FANG4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
4.2%4/10

4.2% revenue growth

Return on EquityProfitability
1.1%3/10

ROE of 1.1% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
2.0%3/10

2.0% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

MTR1 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Market CapQuality
$7.17M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FANG

The strongest argument for FANG centers on Price/Book, Market Cap.

Bull Case : MTR

The strongest argument for MTR centers on Profit Margin, Operating Margin, Revenue Growth. Profitability is solid with margins at 74.8% and operating margin at 90.4%. Revenue growth of 58.8% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : FANG

The primary concerns for FANG are Revenue Growth, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. A P/E of 191.9x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 2.0% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : MTR

The primary concerns for MTR are Market Cap.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FANG profiles as a value stock while MTR is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

MTR carries more volatility with a beta of 0.49 — expect wider price swings.

MTR is growing revenue faster at 58.8% — sustainability is the question.

Monitor OIL & GAS E&P industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

MTR scores higher overall (64/100 vs 41/100), backed by strong 74.8% margins and 58.8% revenue growth. FANG offers better value entry with a 41.1% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Diamondback Energy Inc

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

Diamondback Energy is a company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration and headquartered in Midland, Texas.

Mesa Royalty Trust

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

Mesa Royalty Trust owns net royalty interests in various oil and gas producing properties in the United States. The company is headquartered in Houston, Texas.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?