WallStSmart

ConocoPhillips (COP)vsMesa Royalty Trust (MTR)

VS
⚡

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

ConocoPhillips generates 11652768% more annual revenue ($64.46B vs $553,160). MTR leads profitability with a 66.0% profit margin vs 14.4%. MTR trades at a lower P/E of 12.3x. COP earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 78/100 (B+).

COP

Strong Buy

78

out of 100

Grade: B+

Growth: 7.3Profit: 7.0Value: 6.3Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 2.36

MTR

Hold

44

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 2.0Profit: 8.5Value: 5.0Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 4/9
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for COP.

MTRSignificantly Overvalued (-80.8%)

Margin of Safety

-80.8%

Fair Value

$2.65

Current Price

$2.43

$0.22 premium

UndervaluedFair: $2.65Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

COP6 strengths · Avg: 9.2/10
Operating MarginProfitability
31.5%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 31.5%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
35.5%10/10

Revenue surging 35.5% year-over-year

EPS GrowthGrowth
107.0%10/10

Earnings expanding 107.0% YoY

Market CapQuality
$153.88B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

P/E RatioValuation
16.6x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
2.3x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

MTR4 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Price/BookValuation
1.4x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Profit MarginProfitability
66.0%10/10

Keeps 66 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Operating MarginProfitability
75.6%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 75.6%

P/E RatioValuation
12.3x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Areas to Watch

COP0 concerns · Avg: 0/10

No major concerns identified

MTR3 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Market CapQuality
$4.57M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-28.4%2/10

Revenue declined 28.4%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-33.3%2/10

Earnings declined 33.3%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : COP

The strongest argument for COP centers on Operating Margin, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth. Revenue growth of 35.5% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 1.06 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : MTR

The strongest argument for MTR centers on Price/Book, Profit Margin, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 66.0% and operating margin at 75.6%.

Bear Case : COP

No major red flags identified for COP, but monitor valuation.

Bear Case : MTR

The primary concerns for MTR are Market Cap, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

COP profiles as a growth stock while MTR is a declining play — different risk/reward profiles.

MTR carries more volatility with a beta of 0.42 — expect wider price swings.

COP is growing revenue faster at 35.5% — sustainability is the question.

Monitor OIL & GAS E&P industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

COP scores higher overall (78/100 vs 44/100) and 35.5% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

ConocoPhillips

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

ConocoPhillips is an American multinational corporation engaged in hydrocarbon exploration. It is based in the Energy Corridor district of Houston, Texas.

Mesa Royalty Trust

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

Mesa Royalty Trust owns net royalty interests in various oil and gas producing properties in the United States. The company is headquartered in Houston, Texas.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?