WallStSmart

Toyota Motor Corporation ADR (TM)vsVera Bradley Inc (VRA)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Toyota Motor Corporation ADR generates 18983033% more annual revenue ($51.96T vs $273.70M). TM leads profitability with a 8.6% profit margin vs -7.0%. VRA appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.15. TM earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 65/100 (C+).

TM

Buy

65

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 8.0Profit: 5.5Value: 6.3Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 1.64

VRA

Hold

44

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 3.3Profit: 2.0Value: 5.3Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 2.92

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

TM3 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Market CapQuality
$233.41B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

P/E RatioValuation
8.9x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

EPS GrowthGrowth
86.9%10/10

Earnings expanding 86.9% YoY

VRA1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Price/BookValuation
0.7x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

TM4 concerns · Avg: 3.8/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.564/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Price/BookValuation
16.1x4/10

Trading at 16.1x book value

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.644/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Debt/EquityHealth
1.183/10

Elevated debt levels

VRA4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Market CapQuality
$95.27M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-21.0%2/10

ROE of -21.0% — below average capital efficiency

EPS GrowthGrowth
-36.6%2/10

Earnings declined 36.6%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : TM

The strongest argument for TM centers on Market Cap, P/E Ratio, EPS Growth. Revenue growth of 10.4% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : VRA

The strongest argument for VRA centers on Price/Book. PEG of 1.15 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : TM

The primary concerns for TM are PEG Ratio, Price/Book, Altman Z-Score.

Bear Case : VRA

The primary concerns for VRA are Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score, Return on Equity.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

TM profiles as a value stock while VRA is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.

VRA carries more volatility with a beta of 1.59 — expect wider price swings.

TM is growing revenue faster at 10.4% — sustainability is the question.

VRA generates stronger free cash flow (-6M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

TM scores higher overall (65/100 vs 44/100) and 10.4% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Toyota Motor Corporation ADR

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · AUTO MANUFACTURERS · USA

Toyota Motor Corporation designs, manufactures, assembles and sells passenger cars, minivans and commercial vehicles, and related parts and accessories. The company is headquartered in Toyota, Japan.

Vera Bradley Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · FOOTWEAR & ACCESSORIES · USA

Vera Bradley, Inc. designs, manufactures and sells women's handbags, luggage and travel items, fashion and home accessories, and gifts. The company is headquartered in Roanoke, Indiana.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?