WallStSmart

CNO Financial Group Inc (CNO)vsPrudential PLC ADR (PUK)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Prudential PLC ADR generates 208% more annual revenue ($14.31B vs $4.65B). PUK leads profitability with a 25.5% profit margin vs 6.0%. CNO appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.29. CNO earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 72/100 (B).

CNO

Strong Buy

72

out of 100

Grade: B

Growth: 7.3Profit: 5.5Value: 5.7Quality: 3.5
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 0.12

PUK

Buy

55

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 4.7Profit: 8.5Value: 6.3Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 4/9

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CNO2 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Price/BookValuation
2.0x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
46.2%8/10

Earnings expanding 46.2% YoY

PUK5 strengths · Avg: 9.2/10
P/E RatioValuation
10.0x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Return on EquityProfitability
38.4%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 38 in profit

Profit MarginProfitability
25.5%9/10

Keeps 26 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Debt/EquityHealth
0.309/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Operating MarginProfitability
28.1%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 28.1%

Areas to Watch

CNO3 concerns · Avg: 2.7/10
Profit MarginProfitability
6.0%3/10

6.0% margin — thin

Debt/EquityHealth
1.763/10

Elevated debt levels

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
0.122/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

PUK4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.384/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-1.8%2/10

Revenue declined 1.8%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-23.0%2/10

Earnings declined 23.0%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-77.99M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CNO

The strongest argument for CNO centers on Price/Book, EPS Growth. Revenue growth of 11.6% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 1.29 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : PUK

The strongest argument for PUK centers on P/E Ratio, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 25.5% and operating margin at 28.1%.

Bear Case : CNO

The primary concerns for CNO are Profit Margin, Debt/Equity, Altman Z-Score. Debt-to-equity of 1.76 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : PUK

The primary concerns for PUK are PEG Ratio, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CNO profiles as a value stock while PUK is a declining play — different risk/reward profiles.

PUK carries more volatility with a beta of 0.89 — expect wider price swings.

CNO is growing revenue faster at 11.6% — sustainability is the question.

CNO generates stronger free cash flow (157M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

CNO scores higher overall (72/100 vs 55/100) and 11.6% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

CNO Financial Group Inc

FINANCIAL SERVICES · INSURANCE - LIFE · USA

CNO Financial Group, Inc. develops, markets, and manages health insurance, annuities, individual life insurance, and other insurance products for the middle-income and senior markets in the United States. The company is headquartered in Carmel, Indiana.

Visit Website →

Prudential PLC ADR

FINANCIAL SERVICES · INSURANCE - LIFE · USA

Prudential plc offers life and health insurance, retirement and asset management solutions to people in Asia, the United States and Africa. The company is headquartered in London, the United Kingdom.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?