WallStSmart

Camping World Holdings Inc (CWH)vsRush Enterprises A Inc (RUSHA)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Rush Enterprises A Inc generates 15% more annual revenue ($7.27B vs $6.31B). RUSHA leads profitability with a 3.6% profit margin vs -1.5%. CWH appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.70. CWH earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 51/100 (C-).

CWH

Buy

51

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 4.7Profit: 3.0Value: 5.7Quality: 4.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 1.63

RUSHA

Hold

47

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 4.0Profit: 5.0Value: 4.3Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 3.34
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CWHUndervalued (+28.4%)

Margin of Safety

+28.4%

Fair Value

$17.94

Current Price

$6.05

$11.89 discount

UndervaluedFair: $17.94Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for RUSHA.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CWH2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
122.7%10/10

Earnings expanding 122.7% YoY

Price/BookValuation
1.8x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

RUSHA2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.3410/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Price/BookValuation
2.8x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

CWH4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.704/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.634/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Market CapQuality
$378.58M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Operating MarginProfitability
1.6%3/10

Operating margin of 1.6%

RUSHA4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Profit MarginProfitability
3.6%3/10

3.6% margin — thin

Operating MarginProfitability
4.9%3/10

Operating margin of 4.9%

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
3.162/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CWH

The strongest argument for CWH centers on EPS Growth, Price/Book.

Bull Case : RUSHA

The strongest argument for RUSHA centers on Altman Z-Score, Price/Book.

Bear Case : CWH

The primary concerns for CWH are PEG Ratio, Altman Z-Score, Market Cap. Debt-to-equity of 19.03 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : RUSHA

The primary concerns for RUSHA are Profit Margin, Operating Margin, Piotroski F-Score. Thin 3.6% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CWH profiles as a turnaround stock while RUSHA is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

CWH carries more volatility with a beta of 2.07 — expect wider price swings.

CWH is growing revenue faster at -4.2% — sustainability is the question.

RUSHA generates stronger free cash flow (21M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

CWH scores higher overall (51/100 vs 47/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Camping World Holdings Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · AUTO & TRUCK DEALERSHIPS · USA

Camping World Holdings, Inc., is a recreational vehicle (RV) and outdoor retailer. The company is headquartered in Lincolnshire, Illinois.

Rush Enterprises A Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · AUTO & TRUCK DEALERSHIPS · USA

Rush Enterprises, Inc. is an integrated retailer of commercial vehicles and related services in the United States. The company is headquartered in New Braunfels, Texas.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?