Camping World Holdings Inc (CWH)vsRush Enterprises A Inc (RUSHA)
CWH
Camping World Holdings Inc
$6.04
-0.82%
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · Cap: $416.80M
RUSHA
Rush Enterprises A Inc
$48.31
+0.25%
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · Cap: $5.95B
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
Rush Enterprises A Inc generates 15% more annual revenue ($7.24B vs $6.27B). RUSHA leads profitability with a 3.7% profit margin vs -1.6%. CWH appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.70. RUSHA earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 46/100 (D+).
CWH
Hold42
out of 100
Grade: D
RUSHA
Hold46
out of 100
Grade: D+
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Margin of Safety
+26.3%
Fair Value
$17.43
Current Price
$6.04
$11.39 discount
Intrinsic value data unavailable for RUSHA.
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Reasonable price relative to book value
Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk
Reasonable price relative to book value
Areas to Watch
Expensive relative to growth rate
Distress zone — elevated risk
Smaller company, higher risk/reward
Weak financial health signals
1.1% earnings growth
3.7% margin — thin
Weak financial health signals
Expensive relative to growth rate
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : CWH
The strongest argument for CWH centers on Price/Book.
Bull Case : RUSHA
The strongest argument for RUSHA centers on Altman Z-Score, Price/Book.
Bear Case : CWH
The primary concerns for CWH are PEG Ratio, Altman Z-Score, Market Cap. Debt-to-equity of 15.21 is elevated, increasing financial risk.
Bear Case : RUSHA
The primary concerns for RUSHA are EPS Growth, Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score. Thin 3.7% margins leave little buffer for downturns.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
CWH profiles as a turnaround stock while RUSHA is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.
CWH carries more volatility with a beta of 2.09 — expect wider price swings.
RUSHA is growing revenue faster at -1.6% — sustainability is the question.
CWH generates stronger free cash flow (369M), providing more financial flexibility.
Bottom Line
RUSHA scores higher overall (46/100 vs 42/100). CWH offers better value entry with a 26.3% margin of safety. Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
Camping World Holdings Inc
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · AUTO & TRUCK DEALERSHIPS · USA
Camping World Holdings, Inc., is a recreational vehicle (RV) and outdoor retailer. The company is headquartered in Lincolnshire, Illinois.
Rush Enterprises A Inc
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · AUTO & TRUCK DEALERSHIPS · USA
Rush Enterprises, Inc. is an integrated retailer of commercial vehicles and related services in the United States. The company is headquartered in New Braunfels, Texas.
Compare with Other AUTO & TRUCK DEALERSHIPS Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?