WallStSmart

California Water Service Group (CWT)vsNRG Energy Inc. (NRG)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

NRG Energy Inc. generates 3042% more annual revenue ($33.12B vs $1.05B). CWT leads profitability with a 12.6% profit margin vs 2.6%. NRG appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.46. CWT earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 67/100 (B-).

CWT

Strong Buy

67

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 8.0Profit: 6.0Value: 6.0Quality: 3.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 0.72

NRG

Buy

60

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 3.3Profit: 6.0Value: 6.3Quality: 4.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 1.61
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CWTUndervalued (+21.4%)

Margin of Safety

+21.4%

Fair Value

$56.20

Current Price

$48.22

$7.98 discount

UndervaluedFair: $56.20Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for NRG.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CWT4 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.6x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Operating MarginProfitability
28.2%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 28.2%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
16.5%8/10

16.5% revenue growth

EPS GrowthGrowth
31.4%8/10

Earnings expanding 31.4% YoY

NRG1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
0.4610/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Areas to Watch

CWT4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.224/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Return on EquityProfitability
6.7%3/10

ROE of 6.7% — below average capital efficiency

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-83.38M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

NRG4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
P/E RatioValuation
31.2x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.614/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Profit MarginProfitability
2.6%3/10

2.6% margin — thin

EPS GrowthGrowth
-85.6%2/10

Earnings declined 85.6%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CWT

The strongest argument for CWT centers on Price/Book, Operating Margin, Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 16.5% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : NRG

The strongest argument for NRG centers on PEG Ratio. Revenue growth of 11.0% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 0.46 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : CWT

The primary concerns for CWT are PEG Ratio, Return on Equity, Piotroski F-Score.

Bear Case : NRG

The primary concerns for NRG are P/E Ratio, Altman Z-Score, Profit Margin. Debt-to-equity of 4.83 is elevated, increasing financial risk. Thin 2.6% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CWT profiles as a growth stock while NRG is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

NRG carries more volatility with a beta of 1.17 — expect wider price swings.

CWT is growing revenue faster at 16.5% — sustainability is the question.

NRG generates stronger free cash flow (779M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

CWT scores higher overall (67/100 vs 60/100) and 16.5% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

California Water Service Group

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - REGULATED WATER · USA

California Water Service Group provides public water and related services in California, Washington, New Mexico and Hawaii. The company is headquartered in San Jose, California.

Visit Website →

NRG Energy Inc.

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - INDEPENDENT POWER PRODUCERS · USA

NRG Energy, Inc. is a large American energy company, headquartered in Houston, Texas. It was formerly the wholesale arm of Northern States Power Company (NSP), which became Xcel Energy, but became independent in 2000. NRG Energy is involved in energy generation and retail electricity.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?