WallStSmart

Diamondback Energy Inc (FANG)vsMagnolia Oil & Gas Corp (MGY)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Diamondback Energy Inc generates 1003% more annual revenue ($14.47B vs $1.31B). MGY leads profitability with a 24.8% profit margin vs 2.0%. MGY trades at a lower P/E of 16.3x. MGY earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 50/100 (C-).

FANG

Hold

41

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 5.3Profit: 4.0Value: 4.7Quality: 3.3
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 1.24

MGY

Buy

50

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 2.0Profit: 8.5Value: 5.0Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 2.74
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FANGUndervalued (+44.6%)

Margin of Safety

+44.6%

Fair Value

$305.11

Current Price

$188.70

$116.41 discount

UndervaluedFair: $305.11Overvalued
MGYSignificantly Overvalued (-75.1%)

Margin of Safety

-75.1%

Fair Value

$15.40

Current Price

$27.80

$12.40 premium

UndervaluedFair: $15.40Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FANG2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Price/BookValuation
1.5x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Market CapQuality
$53.58B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

MGY5 strengths · Avg: 8.4/10
Profit MarginProfitability
24.8%9/10

Keeps 25 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Debt/EquityHealth
0.209/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

P/E RatioValuation
16.3x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
2.6x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Operating MarginProfitability
29.6%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 29.6%

Areas to Watch

FANG4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Return on EquityProfitability
0.5%3/10

ROE of 0.5% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
2.0%3/10

2.0% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
57.132/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

MGY3 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-2.8%2/10

Revenue declined 2.8%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-17.0%2/10

Earnings declined 17.0%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FANG

The strongest argument for FANG centers on Price/Book, Market Cap.

Bull Case : MGY

The strongest argument for MGY centers on Profit Margin, Debt/Equity, P/E Ratio. Profitability is solid with margins at 24.8% and operating margin at 29.6%.

Bear Case : FANG

The primary concerns for FANG are Return on Equity, Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score. A P/E of 196.3x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 2.0% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : MGY

The primary concerns for MGY are Piotroski F-Score, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FANG profiles as a value stock while MGY is a declining play — different risk/reward profiles.

MGY carries more volatility with a beta of 0.75 — expect wider price swings.

FANG is growing revenue faster at 9.1% — sustainability is the question.

FANG generates stronger free cash flow (895M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

MGY scores higher overall (50/100 vs 41/100), backed by strong 24.8% margins. FANG offers better value entry with a 44.6% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Diamondback Energy Inc

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

Diamondback Energy is a company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration and headquartered in Midland, Texas.

Magnolia Oil & Gas Corp

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

Magnolia Oil & Gas Corporation is engaged in the acquisition, development, exploration and production of oil, natural gas and natural gas liquid reserves in the United States. The company is headquartered in Houston, Texas.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?