WallStSmart

General Mills Inc (GIS)vsPost Holdings Inc (POST)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

General Mills Inc generates 120% more annual revenue ($18.37B vs $8.36B). GIS leads profitability with a 12.0% profit margin vs 3.8%. POST appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.19. POST earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 58/100 (C).

GIS

Buy

53

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 4.7Profit: 6.5Value: 4.7Quality: 4.3
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 1.99

POST

Buy

58

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 5.3Profit: 5.5Value: 7.3Quality: 4.8
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 1.32
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

GISSignificantly Overvalued (-76.2%)

Margin of Safety

-76.2%

Fair Value

$27.81

Current Price

$36.17

$8.36 premium

UndervaluedFair: $27.81Overvalued
POSTSignificantly Overvalued (-199.7%)

Margin of Safety

-199.7%

Fair Value

$36.99

Current Price

$97.21

$60.22 premium

UndervaluedFair: $36.99Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

GIS3 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
8.8x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Return on EquityProfitability
23.6%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 24 in profit

Price/BookValuation
2.1x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

POST2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.3x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

P/E RatioValuation
17.6x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Areas to Watch

GIS4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.994/10

Grey zone — moderate risk

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
11.742/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-8.4%2/10

Revenue declined 8.4%

POST4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Profit MarginProfitability
3.8%3/10

3.8% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

EPS GrowthGrowth
-3.9%2/10

Earnings declined 3.9%

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.322/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : GIS

The strongest argument for GIS centers on P/E Ratio, Return on Equity, Price/Book.

Bull Case : POST

The strongest argument for POST centers on Price/Book, P/E Ratio. Revenue growth of 10.1% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 1.19 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : GIS

The primary concerns for GIS are Altman Z-Score, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio.

Bear Case : POST

The primary concerns for POST are Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score, EPS Growth. Thin 3.8% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

GIS profiles as a declining stock while POST is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

POST carries more volatility with a beta of 0.34 — expect wider price swings.

POST is growing revenue faster at 10.1% — sustainability is the question.

GIS generates stronger free cash flow (296M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

POST scores higher overall (58/100 vs 53/100) and 10.1% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

General Mills Inc

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · PACKAGED FOODS · USA

General Mills, Inc., is an American multinational manufacturer and marketer of branded consumer foods sold through retail stores. It is headquartered in Golden Valley, Minnesota, a suburb of Minneapolis.

Post Holdings Inc

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · PACKAGED FOODS · USA

Post Holdings, Inc. is a consumer packaged goods holding company in the United States and internationally. The company is headquartered in St. Louis, Missouri.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?