Nu Skin Enterprises Inc (NUS)vsUnilever PLC ADR (UL)
NUS
Nu Skin Enterprises Inc
$4.79
-1.03%
CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · Cap: $230.73M
UL
Unilever PLC ADR
$64.42
-0.83%
CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · Cap: $134.97B
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
Unilever PLC ADR generates 3581% more annual revenue ($50.62B vs $1.38B). UL leads profitability with a 18.3% profit margin vs -15.7%. NUS appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.78. UL earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 48/100 (D+).
NUS
Hold47
out of 100
Grade: D+
UL
Hold48
out of 100
Grade: D+
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Margin of Safety
+53.3%
Fair Value
$21.79
Current Price
$4.79
$17.00 discount
Intrinsic value data unavailable for UL.
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Reasonable price relative to book value
Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk
Growing faster than its price suggests
Every $100 of equity generates 69 in profit
Large-cap with strong market position
Strong operational efficiency at 20.3%
Generating 1.8B in free cash flow
Areas to Watch
Smaller company, higher risk/reward
ROE of 6.9% — below average capital efficiency
Revenue declined 17.1%
Earnings declined 98.2%
0.5% revenue growth
Elevated debt levels
Expensive relative to growth rate
Earnings declined 5.6%
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : NUS
The strongest argument for NUS centers on Price/Book, Altman Z-Score, PEG Ratio. PEG of 0.78 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.
Bull Case : UL
The strongest argument for UL centers on Return on Equity, Market Cap, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 18.3% and operating margin at 20.3%.
Bear Case : NUS
The primary concerns for NUS are Market Cap, Return on Equity, Revenue Growth.
Bear Case : UL
The primary concerns for UL are Revenue Growth, Debt/Equity, PEG Ratio. Debt-to-equity of 1.98 is elevated, increasing financial risk.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
NUS profiles as a turnaround stock while UL is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.
NUS carries more volatility with a beta of 0.97 — expect wider price swings.
UL is growing revenue faster at 0.5% — sustainability is the question.
UL generates stronger free cash flow (1.8B), providing more financial flexibility.
Bottom Line
UL scores higher overall (48/100 vs 47/100), backed by strong 18.3% margins. NUS offers better value entry with a 53.3% margin of safety. Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
Nu Skin Enterprises Inc
CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · HOUSEHOLD & PERSONAL PRODUCTS · USA
Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc. develops and distributes wellness and personal care products globally. The company is headquartered in Provo, Utah.
Visit Website →Unilever PLC ADR
CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · HOUSEHOLD & PERSONAL PRODUCTS · USA
Unilever PLC is a fast moving consumer goods company in Asia, Africa, the Middle East, Turkey, Russia, Ukraine, Belarus, America and Europe. The company is headquartered in London, the United Kingdom.
Compare with Other HOUSEHOLD & PERSONAL PRODUCTS Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?