WallStSmart

PAMT CORP (PAMT)vsXPO Logistics Inc (XPO)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

XPO Logistics Inc generates 1320% more annual revenue ($8.30B vs $584.59M). XPO leads profitability with a 4.2% profit margin vs -7.6%. PAMT appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.94. XPO earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 53/100 (C-).

PAMT

Hold

39

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 2.0Profit: 2.0Value: 7.7Quality: 4.0
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 1.19

XPO

Buy

53

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 6.7Profit: 6.0Value: 2.0Quality: 4.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 1.63
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

PAMTUndervalued (+49.2%)

Margin of Safety

+49.2%

Fair Value

$24.54

Current Price

$13.38

$11.16 discount

UndervaluedFair: $24.54Overvalued
XPOSignificantly Overvalued (-23.4%)

Margin of Safety

-23.4%

Fair Value

$163.60

Current Price

$218.94

$55.34 premium

UndervaluedFair: $163.60Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

PAMT2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.3x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

PEG RatioValuation
0.948/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

XPO1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
46.6%8/10

Earnings expanding 46.6% YoY

Areas to Watch

PAMT4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Market CapQuality
$300.33M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Debt/EquityHealth
1.523/10

Elevated debt levels

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-21.1%2/10

ROE of -21.1% — below average capital efficiency

XPO4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
Price/BookValuation
13.8x4/10

Trading at 13.8x book value

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.634/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Profit MarginProfitability
4.2%3/10

4.2% margin — thin

PEG RatioValuation
2.532/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : PAMT

The strongest argument for PAMT centers on Price/Book, PEG Ratio. PEG of 0.94 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : XPO

The strongest argument for XPO centers on EPS Growth.

Bear Case : PAMT

The primary concerns for PAMT are Market Cap, Debt/Equity, Piotroski F-Score. Debt-to-equity of 1.52 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : XPO

The primary concerns for XPO are Price/Book, Altman Z-Score, Profit Margin. A P/E of 78.7x leaves little room for execution misses. Debt-to-equity of 2.18 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

PAMT profiles as a turnaround stock while XPO is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

XPO carries more volatility with a beta of 1.64 — expect wider price swings.

XPO is growing revenue faster at 7.3% — sustainability is the question.

XPO generates stronger free cash flow (72M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

XPO scores higher overall (53/100 vs 39/100). PAMT offers better value entry with a 49.2% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

PAMT CORP

INDUSTRIALS · TRUCKING · USA

Pamt Corp. The company is headquartered in Tontitown, Arkansas.

Visit Website →

XPO Logistics Inc

INDUSTRIALS · TRUCKING · USA

XPO Logistics, Inc. provides supply chain solutions in the United States, the rest of North America, France, the United Kingdom, the rest of Europe, and internationally. The company is headquartered in Greenwich, Connecticut.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?