WallStSmart

Unilever PLC ADR (UL)vsWaters Corporation (WAT)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Unilever PLC ADR generates 1240% more annual revenue ($50.50B vs $3.77B). UL leads profitability with a 18.8% profit margin vs 11.9%. WAT appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.52. WAT earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 52/100 (C-).

UL

Hold

46

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 2.0Profit: 8.5Value: 4.3Quality: 5.0

WAT

Buy

52

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 5.3Profit: 5.5Value: 3.3Quality: 6.8
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 4.92
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for UL.

WATSignificantly Overvalued (-63.1%)

Margin of Safety

-63.1%

Fair Value

$201.83

Current Price

$355.13

$153.30 premium

UndervaluedFair: $201.83Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

UL4 strengths · Avg: 8.8/10
Return on EquityProfitability
31.0%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 31 in profit

Market CapQuality
$130.20B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Operating MarginProfitability
20.1%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 20.1%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$5.48B8/10

Generating 5.5B in free cash flow

WAT2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
91.5%10/10

Revenue surging 91.5% year-over-year

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
4.9210/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Areas to Watch

UL3 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
10.732/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-3.2%2/10

Revenue declined 3.2%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-3.4%2/10

Earnings declined 3.4%

WAT4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.524/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Price/BookValuation
8.3x4/10

Trading at 8.3x book value

Return on EquityProfitability
5.2%3/10

ROE of 5.2% — below average capital efficiency

P/E RatioValuation
44.6x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : UL

The strongest argument for UL centers on Return on Equity, Market Cap, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 18.8% and operating margin at 20.1%.

Bull Case : WAT

The strongest argument for WAT centers on Revenue Growth, Altman Z-Score. Revenue growth of 91.5% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : UL

The primary concerns for UL are PEG Ratio, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth.

Bear Case : WAT

The primary concerns for WAT are PEG Ratio, Price/Book, Return on Equity. A P/E of 44.6x leaves little room for execution misses.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

UL profiles as a declining stock while WAT is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

WAT carries more volatility with a beta of 1.14 — expect wider price swings.

WAT is growing revenue faster at 91.5% — sustainability is the question.

UL generates stronger free cash flow (5.5B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

WAT scores higher overall (52/100 vs 46/100) and 91.5% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Unilever PLC ADR

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · HOUSEHOLD & PERSONAL PRODUCTS · USA

Unilever PLC is a fast moving consumer goods company in Asia, Africa, the Middle East, Turkey, Russia, Ukraine, Belarus, America and Europe. The company is headquartered in London, the United Kingdom.

Waters Corporation

HEALTHCARE · DIAGNOSTICS & RESEARCH · USA

Waters Corporation is a publicly traded Analytical Laboratory instrument and software company headquartered in Milford, Massachusetts.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?