WallStSmart

Unilever PLC ADR (UL)vsWilliams Companies Inc (WMB)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Unilever PLC ADR generates 327% more annual revenue ($50.50B vs $11.83B). WMB leads profitability with a 22.1% profit margin vs 18.8%. UL appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.91. WMB earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 67/100 (B-).

UL

Buy

50

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 2.0Profit: 8.5Value: 7.3Quality: 5.0

WMB

Strong Buy

67

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 6.7Profit: 8.0Value: 9.3Quality: 3.3
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 0.37
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

ULSignificantly Overvalued (-268.2%)

Margin of Safety

-268.2%

Fair Value

$20.26

Current Price

$60.80

$40.54 premium

UndervaluedFair: $20.26Overvalued
WMBUndervalued (+29.0%)

Margin of Safety

+29.0%

Fair Value

$100.15

Current Price

$73.81

$26.34 discount

UndervaluedFair: $100.15Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

UL4 strengths · Avg: 8.8/10
Return on EquityProfitability
31.0%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 31 in profit

Market CapQuality
$132.46B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Operating MarginProfitability
20.1%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 20.1%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$5.48B8/10

Generating 5.5B in free cash flow

WMB4 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Operating MarginProfitability
41.2%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 41.2%

EPS GrowthGrowth
50.8%10/10

Earnings expanding 50.8% YoY

Market CapQuality
$90.96B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Profit MarginProfitability
22.1%9/10

Keeps 22 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Areas to Watch

UL3 concerns · Avg: 2.7/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.914/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-3.2%2/10

Revenue declined 3.2%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-3.4%2/10

Earnings declined 3.4%

WMB4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.474/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
34.8x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-485.00M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : UL

The strongest argument for UL centers on Return on Equity, Market Cap, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 18.8% and operating margin at 20.1%.

Bull Case : WMB

The strongest argument for WMB centers on Operating Margin, EPS Growth, Market Cap. Profitability is solid with margins at 22.1% and operating margin at 41.2%.

Bear Case : UL

The primary concerns for UL are PEG Ratio, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth.

Bear Case : WMB

The primary concerns for WMB are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Piotroski F-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

UL profiles as a declining stock while WMB is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.

WMB carries more volatility with a beta of 0.65 — expect wider price swings.

WMB is growing revenue faster at 8.7% — sustainability is the question.

UL generates stronger free cash flow (5.5B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

WMB scores higher overall (67/100 vs 50/100), backed by strong 22.1% margins. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Unilever PLC ADR

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · HOUSEHOLD & PERSONAL PRODUCTS · USA

Unilever PLC is a fast moving consumer goods company in Asia, Africa, the Middle East, Turkey, Russia, Ukraine, Belarus, America and Europe. The company is headquartered in London, the United Kingdom.

Williams Companies Inc

ENERGY · OIL & GAS MIDSTREAM · USA

The Williams Companies, Inc., is an American energy company based in Tulsa, Oklahoma. Its core business is natural gas processing and transportation, with additional petroleum and electricity generation assets.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?