WallStSmart

UWM Holdings Corp (UWMC)vsWells Fargo & Company (WFC)

VS
⚡

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Wells Fargo & Company generates 2741% more annual revenue ($83.11B vs $2.93B). WFC leads profitability with a 27.6% profit margin vs -1.3%. WFC earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 74/100 (B).

UWMC

Hold

39

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 6.7Profit: 4.5Value: 5.0Quality: 3.0
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 0.34

WFC

Strong Buy

74

out of 100

Grade: B

Growth: 6.0Profit: 7.5Value: 7.0Quality: 5.5
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: -0.38

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

UWMC2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
277.8%10/10

Earnings expanding 277.8% YoY

Return on EquityProfitability
28.9%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 29 in profit

WFC6 strengths · Avg: 9.2/10
Market CapQuality
$251.75B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

P/E RatioValuation
11.8x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Operating MarginProfitability
34.1%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 34.1%

Profit MarginProfitability
27.6%9/10

Keeps 28 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Price/BookValuation
1.6x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Free Cash FlowQuality
$6.78B8/10

Generating 6.8B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

UWMC4 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
Market CapQuality
$1.69B3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-70.6%2/10

Revenue declined 70.6%

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
0.342/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Profit MarginProfitability
-1.3%1/10

Currently unprofitable

WFC3 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
0.4%4/10

0.4% revenue growth

Debt/EquityHealth
1.263/10

Elevated debt levels

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
-0.382/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : UWMC

The strongest argument for UWMC centers on EPS Growth, Return on Equity.

Bull Case : WFC

The strongest argument for WFC centers on Market Cap, P/E Ratio, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 27.6% and operating margin at 34.1%. PEG of 1.39 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : UWMC

The primary concerns for UWMC are Market Cap, Revenue Growth, Altman Z-Score. Debt-to-equity of 109.53 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : WFC

The primary concerns for WFC are Revenue Growth, Debt/Equity, Altman Z-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

UWMC profiles as a turnaround stock while WFC is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

UWMC carries more volatility with a beta of 1.87 — expect wider price swings.

WFC is growing revenue faster at 0.4% — sustainability is the question.

WFC generates stronger free cash flow (6.8B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

WFC scores higher overall (74/100 vs 39/100), backed by strong 27.6% margins. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

UWM Holdings Corp

FINANCIAL SERVICES · MORTGAGE FINANCE · USA

UWM Holdings Corporation is engaged in the residential mortgage loan business in the United States. The company is headquartered in Pontiac, Michigan.

Wells Fargo & Company

FINANCIAL SERVICES · BANKS - DIVERSIFIED · USA

Wells Fargo & Company is an American multinational financial services company with corporate headquarters in San Francisco, California, operational headquarters in Manhattan, and managerial offices throughout the United States and overseas.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?