Birkenstock Holding plc (BIRK)vsFossil Group Inc (FOSL)
BIRK
Birkenstock Holding plc
$42.34
-1.51%
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · Cap: $8.97B
FOSL
Fossil Group Inc
$4.01
-3.37%
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · Cap: $234.04M
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
Birkenstock Holding plc generates 119% more annual revenue ($2.18B vs $995.91M). BIRK leads profitability with a 16.3% profit margin vs -6.2%. FOSL appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.23. BIRK earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 58/100 (C).
BIRK
Buy58
out of 100
Grade: C
FOSL
Hold38
out of 100
Grade: F
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Intrinsic value data unavailable for BIRK.
Margin of Safety
+73.6%
Fair Value
$14.84
Current Price
$4.01
$10.83 discount
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Reasonable price relative to book value
Strong operational efficiency at 26.9%
Reasonable price relative to book value
Areas to Watch
Grey zone — moderate risk
Earnings declined 20.4%
Distress zone — elevated risk
Smaller company, higher risk/reward
Weak financial health signals
ROE of -58.3% — below average capital efficiency
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : BIRK
The strongest argument for BIRK centers on Price/Book, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 16.3% and operating margin at 26.9%. PEG of 1.38 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.
Bull Case : FOSL
The strongest argument for FOSL centers on Price/Book. PEG of 1.23 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.
Bear Case : BIRK
The primary concerns for BIRK are Altman Z-Score, EPS Growth.
Bear Case : FOSL
The primary concerns for FOSL are Altman Z-Score, Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score. Debt-to-equity of 3.49 is elevated, increasing financial risk.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
BIRK profiles as a mature stock while FOSL is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.
FOSL carries more volatility with a beta of 1.65 — expect wider price swings.
BIRK is growing revenue faster at 7.7% — sustainability is the question.
BIRK generates stronger free cash flow (2M), providing more financial flexibility.
Bottom Line
BIRK scores higher overall (58/100 vs 38/100), backed by strong 16.3% margins. FOSL offers better value entry with a 73.6% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
Birkenstock Holding plc
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · FOOTWEAR & ACCESSORIES · USA
Birkenstock Holding plc manufactures and sells footwear products. The company is headquartered in London, the United Kingdom.
Fossil Group Inc
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · FOOTWEAR & ACCESSORIES · USA
Fossil Group, Inc. designs, develops, markets, and distributes consumer fashion accessories in the United States, Europe, Asia, and internationally. The company is headquartered in Richardson, Texas.
Compare with Other FOOTWEAR & ACCESSORIES Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?