Birkenstock Holding plc (BIRK)vsFossil Group Inc (FOSL)
BIRK
Birkenstock Holding plc
$36.37
-0.30%
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · Cap: $6.71B
FOSL
Fossil Group Inc
$4.10
+0.74%
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · Cap: $112.95M
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
Birkenstock Holding plc generates 97% more annual revenue ($2.14B vs $1.08B). BIRK leads profitability with a 17.7% profit margin vs -5.5%. FOSL appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.23. BIRK earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 71/100 (B).
BIRK
Strong Buy71
out of 100
Grade: B
FOSL
Hold37
out of 100
Grade: F
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Margin of Safety
+63.6%
Fair Value
$109.98
Current Price
$36.37
$73.61 discount
Intrinsic value data unavailable for FOSL.
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Attractively priced relative to earnings
Reasonable price relative to book value
Reasonable price relative to book value
Areas to Watch
1.5% earnings growth
Grey zone — moderate risk
Negative free cash flow — burning cash
Smaller company, higher risk/reward
ROE of -39.3% — below average capital efficiency
Revenue declined 15.2%
Earnings declined 81.7%
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : BIRK
The strongest argument for BIRK centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book. Profitability is solid with margins at 17.7% and operating margin at 19.0%. Revenue growth of 11.1% demonstrates continued momentum.
Bull Case : FOSL
The strongest argument for FOSL centers on Price/Book. PEG of 1.23 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.
Bear Case : BIRK
The primary concerns for BIRK are EPS Growth, Altman Z-Score, Free Cash Flow.
Bear Case : FOSL
The primary concerns for FOSL are Market Cap, Return on Equity, Revenue Growth.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
BIRK profiles as a mature stock while FOSL is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.
FOSL carries more volatility with a beta of 1.64 — expect wider price swings.
BIRK is growing revenue faster at 11.1% — sustainability is the question.
FOSL generates stronger free cash flow (14M), providing more financial flexibility.
Bottom Line
BIRK scores higher overall (71/100 vs 37/100), backed by strong 17.7% margins and 11.1% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
Birkenstock Holding plc
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · FOOTWEAR & ACCESSORIES · USA
Birkenstock Holding plc manufactures and sells footwear products. The company is headquartered in London, the United Kingdom.
Fossil Group Inc
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · FOOTWEAR & ACCESSORIES · USA
Fossil Group, Inc. designs, develops, markets, and distributes consumer fashion accessories in the United States, Europe, Asia, and internationally. The company is headquartered in Richardson, Texas.
Compare with Other FOOTWEAR & ACCESSORIES Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?