WallStSmart

Crocs Inc (CROX)vsFossil Group Inc (FOSL)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Crocs Inc generates 312% more annual revenue ($4.05B vs $985.17M). CROX leads profitability with a 14.6% profit margin vs -7.1%. FOSL appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.23. CROX earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 62/100 (C+).

CROX

Buy

62

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 3.3Profit: 6.0Value: 8.7Quality: 5.5
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 2.59

FOSL

Avoid

35

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 2.0Profit: 3.0Value: 7.0Quality: 4.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 1.36
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CROXUndervalued (+30.4%)

Margin of Safety

+30.4%

Fair Value

$118.93

Current Price

$112.48

$6.45 discount

UndervaluedFair: $118.93Overvalued
FOSLUndervalued (+72.5%)

Margin of Safety

+72.5%

Fair Value

$14.25

Current Price

$4.73

$9.52 discount

UndervaluedFair: $14.25Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CROX2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
10.1x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Operating MarginProfitability
24.2%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 24.2%

FOSL1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Price/BookValuation
3.0x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

CROX4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
2.6%4/10

2.6% revenue growth

Debt/EquityHealth
1.223/10

Elevated debt levels

Return on EquityProfitability
-7.3%2/10

ROE of -7.3% — below average capital efficiency

EPS GrowthGrowth
-4.2%2/10

Earnings declined 4.2%

FOSL4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Market CapQuality
$288.59M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Operating MarginProfitability
3.5%3/10

Operating margin of 3.5%

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-58.3%2/10

ROE of -58.3% — below average capital efficiency

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CROX

The strongest argument for CROX centers on P/E Ratio, Operating Margin. PEG of 1.39 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : FOSL

The strongest argument for FOSL centers on Price/Book. PEG of 1.23 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : CROX

The primary concerns for CROX are Revenue Growth, Debt/Equity, Return on Equity.

Bear Case : FOSL

The primary concerns for FOSL are Market Cap, Operating Margin, Piotroski F-Score. Debt-to-equity of 3.80 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CROX profiles as a value stock while FOSL is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.

FOSL carries more volatility with a beta of 1.63 — expect wider price swings.

CROX is growing revenue faster at 2.6% — sustainability is the question.

CROX generates stronger free cash flow (331M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

CROX scores higher overall (62/100 vs 35/100). FOSL offers better value entry with a 72.5% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Crocs Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · FOOTWEAR & ACCESSORIES · USA

Crocs, Inc. designs, develops, manufactures, markets and distributes casual lifestyle footwear and accessories for men, women and children. The company is headquartered in Broomfield, Colorado.

Fossil Group Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · FOOTWEAR & ACCESSORIES · USA

Fossil Group, Inc. designs, develops, markets, and distributes consumer fashion accessories in the United States, Europe, Asia, and internationally. The company is headquartered in Richardson, Texas.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?