WallStSmart

ConocoPhillips (COP)vsSM Energy Co (SM)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

ConocoPhillips generates 1199% more annual revenue ($64.46B vs $4.96B). SM leads profitability with a 20.2% profit margin vs 14.4%. SM appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.67. SM earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 90/100 (A).

COP

Strong Buy

78

out of 100

Grade: B+

Growth: 7.3Profit: 7.0Value: 5.7Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 2.36

SM

Exceptional Buy

90

out of 100

Grade: A

Growth: 7.3Profit: 7.0Value: 9.3Quality: 5.0
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 1.80
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for COP.

SMUndervalued (+66.3%)

Margin of Safety

+66.3%

Fair Value

$113.35

Current Price

$38.10

$75.25 discount

UndervaluedFair: $113.35Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

COP6 strengths · Avg: 9.2/10
Operating MarginProfitability
31.5%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 31.5%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
35.5%10/10

Revenue surging 35.5% year-over-year

EPS GrowthGrowth
107.0%10/10

Earnings expanding 107.0% YoY

Market CapQuality
$165.00B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Price/BookValuation
2.5x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Free Cash FlowQuality
$4.41B8/10

Generating 4.4B in free cash flow

SM6 strengths · Avg: 9.8/10
P/E RatioValuation
6.7x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
1.2x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Operating MarginProfitability
60.3%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 60.3%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
176.1%10/10

Revenue surging 176.1% year-over-year

EPS GrowthGrowth
153.9%10/10

Earnings expanding 153.9% YoY

Profit MarginProfitability
20.2%9/10

Keeps 20 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Areas to Watch

COP0 concerns · Avg: 0/10

No major concerns identified

SM2 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.804/10

Grey zone — moderate risk

Return on EquityProfitability
2.3%3/10

ROE of 2.3% — below average capital efficiency

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : COP

The strongest argument for COP centers on Operating Margin, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth. Revenue growth of 35.5% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 1.24 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : SM

The strongest argument for SM centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 20.2% and operating margin at 60.3%. Revenue growth of 176.1% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : COP

No major red flags identified for COP, but monitor valuation.

Bear Case : SM

The primary concerns for SM are Altman Z-Score, Return on Equity.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

SM carries more volatility with a beta of 0.75 — expect wider price swings.

SM is growing revenue faster at 176.1% — sustainability is the question.

COP generates stronger free cash flow (4.4B), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor OIL & GAS E&P industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

SM scores higher overall (90/100 vs 78/100), backed by strong 20.2% margins and 176.1% revenue growth. Both earn "Exceptional Buy" and "Strong Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

ConocoPhillips

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

ConocoPhillips is an American multinational corporation engaged in hydrocarbon exploration. It is based in the Energy Corridor district of Houston, Texas.

SM Energy Co

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

SM Energy Company, an independent energy company, is engaged in the acquisition, exploration, development, and production of oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids in the state of Texas. The company is headquartered in Denver, Colorado.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?